|
|
|
Murat Tanriover
{K:8387} 4/6/2004
|
Almost an abstract Raamses. I like this a lot, excellent colors and blur. Well done
|
|
|
|
|
Kees and Carolyn
{K:15193} 4/3/2004
|
Beautiful! I like the soft effect and the tones. Great work!
Carolyn
|
|
|
|
Raamses Ortiz
{K:4408} 4/2/2004
|
Maria, what happend is that I made a mistake on the info and when Hugo read it explained to me that by doing that would be more dificult to me. He understud that I overexposed the photo when in reality I underexposed it on purpuse.
That was all no swett, baby.
Raamses.
|
|
|
|
|
Maria Luisa Vial
{K:36017} 4/2/2004
|
I like it very much... It is very pleasant to the eyes... I do not know why Hugo expressed so much concerns... For me the tones are very delicate... And the compostion is good..
MaLuisa
|
|
|
|
|
Maria Luisa Vial
{K:36017} 4/2/2004
|
I like it very much... It is very pleasant to the eyes... I do not know why Hugo expressed so much concerns... For me the tones are very delicate... And the compostion is good..
MaLuisa
|
|
|
|
|
Raamses Ortiz
{K:4408} 4/2/2004
|
Yes it does! It was an experiment and I liked how it looks.
That's why I posted, because I knew the conditions, I knew what I did and I though I could fix the under exposure. Now I know what to expect, I learned something today.!!
Cheers, Hugo.
|
|
|
|
|
Raamses Ortiz
{K:4408} 4/2/2004
|
Yes it does! It was an experiment and I liked how it look. Thats why I posted, because
|
|
|
|
Hugo de Wolf
{K:185110} 4/2/2004
|
It explains the quality of the photo too.....
|
|
|
|
|
Hugo de Wolf
{K:185110} 4/2/2004
|
You're welcome! I was just curious....;o)
|
|
|
|
|
Raamses Ortiz
{K:4408} 4/2/2004
|
Sorry it was not +3EV, if was -3EV. My mistake in writing. Beacause I it was opsite. I had no much light and I had to hold the camera on my hand. I'll fix the description.
Thanks Hugo,
Raamses.
|
|
|
|
|
Hugo de Wolf
{K:185110} 4/2/2004
|
Hi Raamses, Difficult shot (Read: you made it difficult), shooting at +3EV means the lighting was enough for approx 1/500'. Why did you over expose? The original file must have looked rather washed out. Must have taken some effort to tune down to normal tones, too. And it leaves quite alot of noise and dithered effects. Intentionally? Hmmmm. In creating an artistic image, I think there are other ways to achieve that. I think the scene has much more potential and merit than this photo. Don't mean to be destructive, but I think you can do much better than this.....
Cheers,
Hugo
|
|
|
|
|
xy x
{K:41915} 4/2/2004
|
lovely shells and macro, pleasant colour tones and splendid photoart, congrats, thanks, best regards
|
|
0 
