|
* James *
{K:20200} 2/11/2006
|
wonderful work. wish i could add some constructive criticism but there's nothing i can possibly add. just want to say that you took something rather bland and made it into what some might call postcard material.
james
|
|
|
Luiz Luxvich
{K:287} 6/28/2004
|
Very beautiful and interesting image. Great tones. regards.
|
|
|
David McClenaghan
{K:9481} 5/11/2004
|
Great result using good old traditional methods. Looks fantastic.
|
|
|
Qasem Shukran
{K:303} 5/10/2004
|
Very nice work and the result is so great
|
|
|
Eric TO
{K:1706} 5/10/2004
|
This nice picture proves us again that to get a good photo, effort is needed. Congratulation. Since I have used digital camera, I don't think double exposure technics is possible. BTW, Ernie, thanks for commenting on my "Reach for the light" photo. --Eric
|
|
|
Emanuel Correia
{K:739} 4/29/2004
|
Perfect almost from a movie, magnific
|
|
|
danny lovin
{K:681} 2/13/2004
|
great shot its funny though if you take the legs off the tower and block out the writing on the tower it would look like a flying saucer. you are right thought this shot took a lot of effort and forethought. congrats on a great shot.
|
|
|
Lee Harris
{K:14694} 2/7/2004
|
Very nice picture, I don't understand all the above but it sounds like you worked hard for this image and for me the end result is very appealing. Best Regards Lee
|
|
|
Ernie Basciano
{K:1940} 2/7/2004
|
Dan, thanks for the comment but this was not done digitally. it is a double exposure done in camera. (a lot of work, but worth it) This photo was taken way before I got into computer stuff.
|
|
|
Michel Stuber
{K:417} 2/7/2004
|
wow! sehr schön, geniale komposition
|
|
|
Dan Arthur
{K:4280} 2/7/2004
|
VERY COOL digital darkroom work! No, EXCELLENT DD work! Regards, Dan
|
|
|
Uchin Mahazaki
{K:205} 2/7/2004
|
WTF !!!! da best double exposure foto i`ve ever seen !!!
|
|
|
Monty Emken (Ostracon X)
{K:4804} 2/7/2004
|
Wonderful work Ernie! Fantastic! Well done.!! bravo...
|
|