|
|
|
Stefan Engström
{K:24473} 2/15/2004
|
Mary - I think you are right that simple is better for these...
Andreas - The sun is nice but rather tempramental and I have over-exposed several prints on account of variability in the exposure with that source. The important question to me is whether there is a difference in quality from more intense exposure, or from more colinear rays. If there is not I don't really mind waiting for an hour for the process as long as I can get predictable results of the same quality.
|
|
|
|
|
Andreas Wolkerstorfer
{K:5090} 2/14/2004
|
a better UV source is probably a good idea: whats about the sun? Got acceptable results after five minutes in the sun, just trying 6x6 negatives - + a glass plate so that the negatives cant move ...
|
|
|
|
|
sandy c. hopkins
{K:17107} 1/30/2004
|
love the hues you used stefan!
the movie was cape fear...the original..with robert mitchum
|
|
|
|
|
Cherie Spike
{K:-21959} 1/30/2004
|
p.s. THANK YOU!!!!!!!! I'm gigglimg like a 5 year old... you are so cool!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Cherie Spike
{K:-21959} 1/30/2004
|
This is simply beautiful to look at Stefan. That blue tone makes me go ooohhhhh! I love the framing too, it's like you grabbed a moment of the past and and... dunno... bad with words today... a fave :)
|
|
|
|
|
MaryBell
{K:32791} 1/29/2004
|
Stefan,
I don't know much about the process itself (never tried it). However, my observations of them is that less is more - simple compositions speak more effectively than busy ones (probably because the blue tends to overwhelm the shot in busy comps). So I would say you are off to a good start...
Mary
BTW I think I like the light version equally well...
|
|
|
|
|
Stefan Engström
{K:24473} 1/28/2004
|
This is the unadjusted scan.
|
|
|
0 
