|
|
Subhash Sen
{K:11931} 1/15/2004
|
Nice effects regards subhash
|
|
|
|
Orazio Minnella
{K:49417} 1/10/2004
|
Beautiful wiew! Great details!Excellent composition,colors and light
Regards
|
|
|
|
|
Roger Cotgreave
{K:15892} 1/9/2004
|
works well in this end of the world rog, I just go cross-eyes and work backwards...could you do it with peopel? Maybe you should try it get you started in people shots...
|
|
|
|
Roger Williams
{K:86139} 1/9/2004
|
The fact the RH scene is "softer" is probably human error. It was a bit late by the time I got around to sharpening the images for Usefilm. The two lenses on the camera are supposed to be identical, although I do detect a slight difference in colour temperature... And no, Bertram, this isn't part of standard stereo technique. Thank you for even thinking of it... You also may be one of the 30% or so of people whose eyes drift out, rather than in, when relaxing, in which case you need the photos reversed. Some people always show stereo pictures using three images in a row--L, R, L--so that you can pick either the LH pair or the RH pair, depending on how your eyes relax. I don't anyone who can view stereo pictures BOTH ways.
|
|
|
|
Rob Ernsting
{K:8899} 1/9/2004
|
Hi Roger. Just out of interest and my ignorance when it comes to Stereo photos, why is the photo on the left side sharper than the right one? Good shot. Regards Rob.
|
|
|
|
|
The Armed Eye
{K:3563} 1/9/2004
|
It's a very nice winter atmosphere, and I like this shot tho I can't click in stereo on the monitor. Both images are a little different in point of view, that is afaik necessary for a correct stereo view. The right version looks less sharp, also a techical condition for stereo view ?
|
|
|
|
|
Antonella Nistri
{K:21867} 1/9/2004
|
Roger,I love the mood,but since I have a sight problem I'm ill at ease when I look at stereo photos! Congrats,Antonella
|
|
|
|
|
Brian Ferrell
{K:135} 1/8/2004
|
Mister, you flipped them again. I mean I suppose it doesn't matter if most people that see them aren't going to have stereoscope viewers or cannot view them without a viewer then it doesn't make a hill of beans. I'd like to see more stereo images if you feel like putting them up.
I think that the best stereo images I took were whenever I had a subject at 3 ft. slightly in front of another element at 12' and a background object around 25'-50' which gave some great depth. This image has some great depth within the trees. I think if you had part of a tree or cannon in the foreground, it would really get the cool effect.
|
|
|
|
|
Tomo Radovanovic
{K:12788} 1/8/2004
|
stereo, noise reduction... dolby? :)
excellent shot!
|
|
0 
