|
|
|
Deleted User
{K:4598} 1/17/2003
|
Nice balance and good color with good detail. The sky is rich and it appears that a CP was used. Offsets the lighter foreground well.
|
|
|
|
|
Nicolette Kintz
{K:146} 8/9/2002
|
Thanks for the help and taking the time...If you get a chance could you real quick take a glance at the bunnies pict. and tell me if you think the DOF is too shallow?If you don't have the time , I understand ,but it's been bugging me and I need an opinion I can trust. Thanks again!
|
|
|
|
|
William R Eastman III
{K:2141} 8/9/2002
|
Ok, I give--what happened to Steve Kompier's photos? It is none of my business of course...
|
|
|
|
|
William R Eastman III
{K:2141} 8/9/2002
|
Wayne. In a lot of these places they build their digs over their digs. sixty feet down that shaft it's a lot more comfortable than the 110 degrees on the surface--it's also a good place to stash the babes.
Vincent. It did! There's not a Hilton for three hundred miles.
Nicolette. This is full, hard sun. You can expose for the highlights and let the rest take care of itself--or bracket for deliberate underexposure. I'm a strong believer in underexposing slide film for richer colors--as long as the exposure on your primary subject is ok.
Here is the same scene in the evening when the light should have made the photo--as you can see, it doesn't.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nicolette Kintz
{K:146} 8/9/2002
|
Is this what people call quaint to make themselves feel better?Nice shot.Do you need a polarizer filter to get the sky that blue?
|
|
|
|
Vincent K. Tylor
{K:7863} 8/9/2002
|
Look out! This place may put the Hilton out of business.
|
|
|
|
Wayne Harridge
{K:18292} 8/9/2002
|
Ok William, where did you put all the beautiful women ?
|
|
0 
