|
|
|
Toni Martin
{K:5092} 7/31/2002
|
Kim, they are both very nice. Being a Dry Brush fan myself, I have to say I do like the painted one. It's my favorite tool. I like taking the image beyond a photograph!
|
|
|
|
|
000 000
{K:1471} 7/31/2002
|
Hi Kim!
A nice shot. I think, I like the Oriinal one.
If you like playing or making changes with PS, I would suggest you sharppen the original a bit. The color of the worked version is too heavy.
|
|
|
|
|
000 000
{K:1471} 7/31/2002
|
Hi Kim!
A nice shot. i think i like the Oriinal one.
If you like playing or making changes with PS, I would suggest you sharppen it a bit. The color of the worked version is too heavy.
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas Paul
{K:111} 7/31/2002
|
I like the original. It begs to be printed on watercolor or fine art paper. I took a quick glance at some of your work, it's very good.
Tom
|
|
|
|
|
Kim Culbert
{K:37070} 7/31/2002
|
Thanks for the comment John... I keep waffling back and forth over which I like more. Both work for me, as the print is a bit sharper than the scan, but the PS has many interesting qualities that I like as well. I'm having a lot of fun working with the macros and different flowers so thanks for the encouragment everyone!
|
|
|
|
|
John Charlton
{K:5595} 7/31/2002
|
I like the original, but I think it wasn't quite as strong (maybe not quite sharp enough to be outstanding) as I would have hoped it to be. The photoshoped version is very interesting and I believe superior to the original. I agree with Mary Sue about the tightly cropped flower looking down into the frame. A most striking composition.
|
|
|
|
Mary Sue Hayward
{K:17558} 7/30/2002
|
The original is lovely. To me, it is a much stronger image than the PS'd version. That is not to say that sometimes it is plain fun to use PS just for fun. Thanks for showing both.
|
|
|
|
|
Tony Lore
{K:6} 7/30/2002
|
It looks pretty. But as a photography works, overdo in PS I think. I prefer the one without PS. BTW, Kim I enjoy your macro works.
|
|
|
|
|
Tony Lore
{K:6} 7/30/2002
|
It looks pretty. But as a photography works, overdo in PS I think. I prefer the one without PS. BTW, Kim I enjoy your macro works.
|
|
|
|
|
Kim Culbert
{K:37070} 7/30/2002
|
Thanks for the comment Mary... I will take another look at the PS and see if I can tone it down for a more natural "painting" look.
Here is the original!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mary Sue Hayward
{K:17558} 7/30/2002
|
To me the PS is a bit heavy, although I have certainly done the same with some of my florals. Yes, please do post the original, it would be nice to see what you started with. Compositionally, I like how the flower seems to look down into the frame, and I like the square format. I am enjoying your work.
|
|
0 
