|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 7/30/2009
|
And it seems also that I paid a high tribute to the difficulty of the scene, Vandi. So many problems here, as Tony and Ian already said.
Cheers!
Nick
|
|
|
|
Vandy Neculae
{K:7990} 7/29/2009
|
Nice composition, Nick.
Really difficult shot!
|
|
|
|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 7/29/2009
|
Thanks a lot, Marcio!
I assume you mean that the lantern also has its benefits for the light of the image?
Cheers!
Nick
|
|
|
|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 7/29/2009
|
Thanks a lot Dave!
It does, however, has many problems, as Tony and Ian already pointed out.
Cheers!
Nick
|
|
|
|
Marcio Janousek
{K:32538} 7/28/2009
|
No doubt that without the luminaire would be immensely interesting to the shapes. But where would the light to do so?
|
|
|
|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 7/28/2009
|
Thanks a lot Gustavo!
It has many problems as Tony and Ian already pointed out.
Cheers!
Nick
|
|
|
|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 7/28/2009
|
Thanks a lot, Marcus. It has its heavy problems as Tony and Ian pointed out.
BTW, what do you mean with "Taste of this environment created by the transformation" - what taste and what transformation? :-/
Cheers!
Nick
|
|
|
|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 7/28/2009
|
It is problematic, Bubai. See also the comments of Tony and Ian.
Nonetheless, thanks a lot.
Nick
|
|
|
|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 7/28/2009
|
The overexposed parts are indeed there and the bad focus too, Ian. About the underexposed parts I don't agree, as I already wrote to Tony. In places where there is nothing to see... there is nothing to see.
Thanks a lot for getting into the caravan.
Nick
|
|
|
|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 7/28/2009
|
Thanks a lot for the nice detailed comment, Tony!
The overexposure of the intense highlights indeed worked together with the weak focus (by clipping) and so the fine details were eliminated. About the underexposure, I don't think so. Absolute darkness is absolute darkness, it can't be "underexposed". If there is nothing to see there, then the image will also contain nothing to see there. Same goes for the possible details on very dark (but not absolutely dark) regions. The image should catch more or less what could be seen also with the eye. Or so I think - please correct me if I am wrong.
The flashlight would certainly make the job easier from the point of view of exposure, but I am afraid that the warm light of that candle in the lantern would suffer then. Is there any flash that produces a similar kind of light, by the way? That could be interesting in cases like this one. Still the problem would be if the additional flash would overexpose the scene's own highlights but I guess too that it could work much better.
Thank you verymuch again for the serious critique! Cheers!
Nick
|
|
|
|
Dave Stacey
{K:150877} 7/28/2009
|
Good capture of an interesting subject, Nick! I like the warm colours here, too.
Dave.
|
|
|
|
Gustavo Scheverin
{K:164501} 7/27/2009
|
Me gusta mucho, excelentes los colores y las texturas, en ese sentido siempre tus fotos son muy buenas. Se lo puede ver como un abstracto donde esa puerta le pone un poco de interesante misterio.
Un abrazo!
|
|
|
|
Marcus Vianna
{K:4552} 7/26/2009
|
Taste of this environment created by the transformation, moreover was romantic with the little light and the beautiful angle of the photo.
Congratulations for the beautiful composition,
Marcus
|
|
|
|
Aungsita Chatterjee
{K:19843} 7/26/2009
|
wow excellent........ nice composition ,lovely light.
hugs bubai.
|
|
|
|
Ian McIntosh
{K:42997} 7/26/2009
|
ouch blown out hilights AND underexposed. Sounds like a tough assignment, bujt I'm sure he's right. Me I'm glad to have an invitationto such a caravan as this (I know it isn't).
|
|
|
|
|
Tony Smallman
{K:23858} 7/26/2009
|
Blown-out highlights,underexposed and nothing particularly in focus.Perhaps a flashgun would have produced a more acceptable result.The photo does have some potential;the shape reminds me a little of a human head seen from behind.I'm
usually quite reluctant to use a flash-especially working with Stage events- but sometimes you get a much better result.
Best regards, Tony
|
|
0 
