Styles and methods

Andre D.	Shirley D. C.	Nick L.	Barbara S.	Vincent K.	Gary D.	Mark J.	Gerhard B.

	Sign Up Now! \| Log In \| Help
	Your photo sharing community!

	Your Photo Art Is Not Just A Fleeting Moment In Social Media imageopolis is dedicated to the art and craft of photography! Upload your photos. Award recipients are chosen daily.
Click above to buy imageopolis art for your home or office.	Read About Awards, Featured Critiques and Comments - Click HERE
Check Out Today's Uploads - Click HERE Check Out Timeless Photos From The Past - Click HERE

Share On

Image Title: Styles and methods

0	Favorites: 0
Small \| Medium \| Large

By: Nick Karagiaouroglou

View Photo Gallery of Nick Karagiaouroglou click HERE

This photo has won the following Awards

Projects & Categories

Browse Images

All imageopolis Pictures

Award Winners

Staff Choice

Editors Choice

Featured Donors

Featured Photographers

Image Options

Images With No Critiques

Categories

Projects

Photographer	Nick Karagiaouroglou {Karma:127263}
Project	#40 Street Photography	Camera Model	Canon T90
Categories	Cityscape Street Florals	Film Format	24x36
Portfolio		Lens	Tokina RMC 28-70mm
Uploaded	3/4/2007	Film / Memory Type	Fuji Superia
		ISO / Film Speed
Views	304	Shutter
Favorites	0	Aperture	f/
Critiques	2	Rating	Pending / 0 Ratings
Location	City - Zurich State - Country - Switzerland
About	Though I took this one for the series "Stationary traveller" it could fit in the series about trees as well. Again a comparison of the natural and the artificial methods to to things. Nature follows the path of making rather complex objects out of some few simple basic rules, while artificial objects exhibit no real complexity but have rather simple structures as results of application of rather many an rather complicated underlying rules. What about the light here? I have the impression that the photo is a bit solarized.

Random Pictures By:
Nick
Karagiaouroglou

The car, the bicyclist and the pedestrian

There are 2 Comments in 1 Pages
1

Nick Karagiaouroglou

{K:127263} 3/4/2007

You did recognize the main elements of this one very professionaly, Robert! And so I thank you for the short but meaningful comment.

I give film much more than a go, since I don't use anything else - at least until digital reaches the theoretical limits of at least 120-200MP, which is the nominal number of pixels of a usual film frame at 24mm x 36mm - not to speak about the gigantic MP number of medium format or even large format. Oh yes, it is much more cumbersome than the 1-2-3 digital approach, but at least one has much more reasons to sit down and learn, in order to deal in a serious manner with photography. Which of course does not mean that digital photography has to be unserious - not at all! It is only that the "easiness" of digital photography apparently made many too many think that the word "digital" is a warrant for best results without the necessary hard work. ;-)

Wasted pixels are the same as wasted film, as Mr. Anreas Gursky already said :-)

Best wishes,

Nick

Campbell Cameron

{K:1682} 3/4/2007

I like this image and your take on it's inception. I also like the curvlinear distortion on the building, I feel it adds to the picture. Oh! and I also like people who still give film a go.

Elapsed Time:: 0.203125

Your photo sharing community!