Thank you, Luis, Tom, Deniz & Syrie, i belive that "good works" should be stand for itself...., and i know i have a lot to learn but i'll keep on trying my best to achieve..., Thanks~
(ref. org photo): http://www.pbase.com/image/15467600 Thanks for your comments, i'll try to tell u my "cats wall" by my poor english. Well, it started from my photo doc. "cat street".. my record of street cat's life in hong kong. In that collection, i meet some of the street kittens that they r so nice and affectionate.. but for some reason (like sick, blind, even not good looking) can't get a forever home. People don't accept them b4 they get to know them... treat them bad for no reason.... (like the mis-understanding and dark for cat in the medieval age.)
i started to review my catstreet to find image that can express my sad feeling about this... and i still wish some day they'll be more understood, and welcome... so i try to mix this photo.. for them...
This is very... errr... strange. I'm not sure that I understand what you're saying, whether it's a phsychological message, or perhaps an aesthetic one, or something else all together that you're trying to express to your viewer. I viewed some of your other images on pbase. At first I thought perhaps you sandwiched two negatives together in the darkroom, or used liquid emulsion on stone. But then you have similar photos in color... so I would imagine this is digitally created? It's rather disturbing, and that is certainly a plus... an emotional reaction on my part. I see some sort of texture or filter doing something strange to the cat's eyes in a realistic sort of way, and then I see something unrealistic happening to it's fur. A strange mix of effects. I have a hard time deciding whether it appeals to me or not. I can honestly say that it imparts no clear message to me. But perhaps with prolonged viewing...
However, I also am a great fan of images that, rather than convey a clear and obvious message, are open to a viewer's own imaginative interpretation. I believe that while expressing your own personal messages through art can be fulfilling, so too can creating art that lets the viewer explore his or her own imagination. However, such art is more difficult to critique, as one has to question whether the art was created to allow free interpretive thought, or whether somebody simply created something randomly and without inspiration only to call it a work of art produced to inspire open interpretation. Of course this leads us into a very complex discussion of what is and is not art, and how one can tell the difference, and I'm not sure there's room enough on the page, as that discussion is likely to never come to an end (as history shows us). So, I will just say that I honestly have no idea what you are trying to accomplish, but I feel I can confidently give you the benefit of the doubt and see this as a work open to unlimited interpretation. Now maybe you'll tell me a little more about it?
0 
