|
|
Critique By:
Aram Gharib (K:4656)
10/26/2005 5:21:49 AM
Just a precision, Dear Ina, about the question of "what the subject of A photograph might be" (I meant "in general"): I am in total agree with you and for me the question is never "what the photographer (or the artist in general) WANTED to be the subject of the work" but what actually it is (for me and you the observer). There you'll have to look for relationships and proportions of the visible elements AND, going beyond the frame of the photograph, looking for possible hidden meanings (hidden even to the artist)... Well it can be a long long discussion and I am not a specialist in aesthetic matters.
This was just to say that I do agree with you and am glad that you find these words of some interest.
Cordially yours.
A.
|
| Photo By: Ina Nicolae
(K:44481)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Aram Gharib (K:4656)
9/13/2005 3:04:28 AM
I cannot say more than what has already been said on the appealing characteristics of this picture.
May I just insist on the nice contrast of straight and square shapes of the background building with "irregular" texture and curviline features of trees.
The absence of people is also a factor that emphasizes the particularity of this place that, without its inhabitants, looks more perfect!!
Thanks for sharing.
|
| Photo By: Todd Miller
(K:16464)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Aram Gharib (K:4656)
7/23/2005 5:18:13 AM
Yes! Photographing kids is a transaction: you capture the moment and they receive a little portion of attention. The camera is the instrument to receive and to give.
Nice picture, Mary. Thanks for sharing it.
|
| Photo By: mary karimi
(K:10818)
|
|
