|
|
Zeev Scharf
{K:25603} 2/19/2006
|
Excellent composition with this beautiful flower,superb colors and details
Best regards
|
|
|
|
|
Mary Brown
{K:71879} 1/31/2006
|
Hi Gabriela. Thanks for your comment. I'm glad you like the B&W. Right now, I don't have my computer. I am not so good at comverting to B$W yet, but working on it. My hard drive died on my 3 month old computer. I can use my laptop for making comments. Right now, I can't get at my former picures. However, I did not lose them, so that's the good part.
|
|
|
|
Gabriela Tanaka
{K:16594} 1/31/2006
|
Dear mary, this is a beautiful crop, very painterly! WHY did you not post the B&W version? The thumbnail you show below is too small to judge, unfortunately. I have the feeling that the B&W version might be quite a different picture. Please, do put it on!
Thanks for the visit at MY flowers recently. Hope you had a smile on your face afterwards.
Regards,
Gabriela
|
|
|
|
|
Marusnik Bela
{K:11611} 1/30/2006
|
Very nice tones in a perfectly composed close-up shot! Excellent work! Dear Mary many thanks for your kind comments!Regards, Bela
|
|
|
|
|
Ange Brett
{K:1642} 1/24/2006
|
Great shot love the colours and nice soft focus around the edges
Ange
|
|
|
|
m ,
{K:15872} 1/14/2006
|
A very beautiful picture with an attractive name! Harmony connecting colour and shadow! A nice work!
|
|
|
|
|
Robert Chin
{K:22282} 12/30/2005
|
Beautiful composition.Well done.
Regards
|
|
|
|
Glenn Edmiston
{K:7366} 11/13/2005
|
nice shot Mary well composed cheers glenn
|
|
|
|
|
Galal El Missary
{K:84569} 11/2/2005
|
Beautiful shot Dear Mary , great composition & colors , I like the B&w version olse , well done .
Galal
|
|
|
|
Alison DuFlon
{K:36566} 11/1/2005
|
This is so pretty Mary, I like the color one better, because you can see more of the subtle color changes. The stem that has lost its petals seems to be looking up at the beautiful bloom. Alison
|
|
|
|
|
Margaret Sturgess
{K:49403} 11/1/2005
|
I like both versions Mary
Margaret
|
|
|
|
NN
{K:26787} 10/31/2005
|
Hi Mary! I don?t think it has lost too much quality. A beautiful crop indeed, and I think it fits in B&W as well! Good work!
|
|
|
|
|
Gabriela Tanaka
{K:16594} 10/27/2005
|
Dear Mary, the coloured version is more sensuous(one can write an essay on what this floral expresses!), while the B&W is more elegant! But they are both GREAT!!!
Gabriela
|
|
|
|
Bob Aldridge
{K:14758} 10/26/2005
|
An exellent peace of work Mary nice and close too,
love the colour and commposition!!!!!!!!,well done
Mary congrats...Bob Aldridge.
|
|
|
|
|
Zeev Scharf
{K:25603} 10/23/2005
|
Excellent capture of thids beautiful flower Mary
magnificent cropping,the shades are amazing
I like better the color version here
Many thanks for all your so nice comments
My best regards
|
|
|
|
|
Giorgio Goretti
{K:15471} 10/21/2005
|
very elegant image Mary... well done
cheers, Giorgio
|
|
|
|
Trish McCoy
{K:15897} 10/20/2005
|
not fond of the bw image but color is beautiful.
|
|
|
|
|
patrizio napolitano
{K:13119} 10/19/2005
|
bella ed elegante
patrizio
|
|
|
|
Shady Adly
{K:7814} 10/19/2005
|
This is wonderful...the rose,the colours ,the mood..simply everything! So well seen...
Regards,
|
|
|
|
|
Roberto Okamura
{K:22851} 10/19/2005
|
Very beautiful floral Mary!
Excellent work!
Congrats!
Roberto.
|
|
|
|
|
Nando Mondino
{K:14261} 10/17/2005
|
Fantastic macro my friend.
|
|
|
|
Marcus Armani
{K:36599} 10/17/2005
|
This is beautiful Mary, the soft colors and nice lighting is perfect. very nicely done.
|
|
|
|
Hanggan Situmorang
{K:37833} 10/17/2005
|
Great framing and composition, Mary. Well you can try it in BW, too, Mary, I can't determine whether it will be good or not. I think the quality doesn't lose at all, as long you didn't enlarge the pixels..:)
|
|
|
|
Sergio Cárdenas
{K:25028} 10/17/2005
|
Beautiful macro Mary! great composition, colors and details, very well done
My best wishes
Sergio
|
|
|
|
Toshi
{K:11924} 10/16/2005
|
I think I prefer the B&W version Mary, it adds some character to the photo and helps you look past the slight loss of sharpness due to the close cropping. Either way, a great floral capture.
|
|
|
|
Mark Kresl
{K:9434} 10/16/2005
|
I have to admit, I like the B&W better, Mary. It has such muted tones, that I believe B&W enhances the details. There are so many flowers posted with red in them (mine included). In black and white, i think this shot is special.
Mark
|
|
|
|
|
Mark Sherman
{K:15669} 10/16/2005
|
See the bounty of the youth of this bloom and then in the bottom right the loss of such beauty. Almost looks like it's reaching to the empty bud. the black and white came out beautiful also.
This is a page that is commercial but does have some painting's by Georgia O'keef and a short biography.
http://www.zazooartprints.com/okeeffe/okeeffe.html
|
|
|
|
Giulio Rotelli
{K:28441} 10/16/2005
|
Per me è migliore la versione colorata: il rosa del fiore si stagli contro il verde delle foglie e divide la composizione in due, creando due piani di lettura ben distinti, nel bianco e nero il contrasto c'è ma non così netto.
|
|
|
|
Susie OConnor
{K:34798} 10/16/2005
|
I like the color version much better. It is a soft feeling photo, which works really well here no matter the reason. Nice! :)
|
|
|
|
Roger Williams
{K:86139} 10/16/2005
|
You reached for me and GOT me, Mary. I don't know about going all the way to B&W but I wouldn't mind turning down the wick on saturation just a wee bit. I'm not much of a one for close cropping, but this looks fine to me.
Ah! I see you added the B&W version below. Hmmm. The translucence of the petals comes over very well, and makes this successful, I think... Very different, isn't it! Hardly looks like the same shot.
|
|
|
|
Linda Imagefree
{K:72276} 10/16/2005
|
I like the cropping Mary, and the complementary colors..I also like the b&w version, it has a kind of elegance, the delicate curves of the petals in both versions are lovely..the only thing I think I might have been tempted to do is perhaps remove some of the petals from the top and the very left side just to emphasize the beauty, and the folds/curves of the one flower...but even as it is, it's lovely....Linda
|
|
|
|
|
Del Metheny
{K:25617} 10/16/2005
|
Normally I do not like flowers in B&W. I feel it takes from their natural beauty but in this case the variations in shades really pops out at you when the color is removed and gives it a sort of delicate look that is missing in the color. I prefer the B&W in this situation. Del.
|
|
|
|
Gustavo Scheverin
{K:164501} 10/16/2005
|
Hermoso y delicado macro.
Felicitaciones!
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Spracklen
{K:32552} 10/15/2005
|
I'm not ordinarily much of a B&W man, Mary, but I really like your B&W version of this shot.
Excellent work.
Best regards, Chris
|
|
|
|
Larry Fosse
{K:66493} 10/15/2005
|
Hey Mary...how's the baby???...beautiful soft floral...nice colors
|
|
|
|
|
Mary Brown
{K:71879} 10/15/2005
|
Here's the B&W version.
MAry
|
|
|
|
|
julie hugill
{K:6730} 10/15/2005
|
Very pretty picture Mary lovely colours and well presented !!
Julie
|
|
0 
