|
|
|
Pat Christian
{K:119} 8/28/2002
|
Terrance,
The improper contrast is because the original I used to file this image is not from my original 35mm negative frame, but my 16x20" print. It wouldn't fit on my flatbed scanner, so I photographed it outside in the sun with an inexpesive Kodak DC215 Zoom digital camera. My negative is sharp and so is the large print.
pat
|
|
|
|
|
Pat Christian
{K:119} 8/28/2002
|
Terrance,
The improper contrast is because the original I used to file this image is not from my original 35mm negative frame, but my 16x20" print. It wouldn't fit on my flatbed scanner, so I photographed it outside in the sun with an inexpesive Kodak DC215 Zoom digital camera. My negative is sharp and so is the large print.
pat
|
|
|
|
|
Kim Culbert
{K:37070} 7/2/2002
|
Wow, what a face! This holds so much character! I don't mind the lack of contrast, the greyness adds an "oldness" to this image. Well seen!
|
|
|
|
|
Terrence Kent
{K:7023} 12/28/2001
|
Great - but contrast. Underexposure does mean things. I'd just go ahead and punch up the contrast, obviously this moment won't happen again.
|
|
|
|
|
Debbie Groff
{K:9569} 10/24/2001
|
You did a fine job in the lighting of his face and what an "expression".
|
|
0 
