|
|
|
Arthur Kornienko
{K:9686} 10/11/2004
|
This is an excellent picture Mark. Composition is wonderful. I may have rotated it slightly to the left but thats all. Colours are very rich and again the sharpness is excellent. I assume this is at the 28 end of the lens. Is the lens that sharp right through to 300, I find it amazing. Congrats on a nice picture, Art.
|
|
|
|
|
John Hatziemmanouil
{K:40580} 8/13/2004
|
Aaaahhh! Here we are! What a great feald! The architecture of the middle building and all these metalic bars makes this image VERY original.
|
|
|
|
Saeed Al Shamsi
{K:47735} 8/11/2004
|
Very perspective,a wonderful shot with use of geometrical shape,super.Saeed
|
|
|
|
Hugo de Wolf
{K:185110} 8/9/2004
|
Hi Mark, Thanks for your reply; that's almost exactly what I had in mind. Works very well, if not then even a bit better.... ) It only is a bit of a compromise, I think. Must've been towards the outer limits of the lens. A bit more grass in this case would've finished it. Looks like you're in need of a wide angle lens....;o)
Cheers,
Hugo
|
|
|
|
Mark Kresl
{K:9434} 8/9/2004
|
Hugo, thanks for comment. Actually, here is another view that I took that day.
|
|
|
|
|
Don Loseke
{K:32503} 8/9/2004
|
Mark this is a great perspective of this beautiful area. Must be lots of possibilities around this place. Well done. Don.
|
|
|
|
|
Hugo de Wolf
{K:185110} 8/9/2004
|
Hi Mark, excellent composition, and I love the lush and brigth colours. Very good perspective too. The activity in the park adds a very dynamic element to this shot. Well captured.
Have you considered taking this shot in a portrait format, including the skyscrapers in the background completely into the composition? Maybe that would reduce the power of this shot, but it would be nice to see the difference.
Cheers,
hugo
|
|
|
|
|
Eddy Yusuf
{K:1353} 8/9/2004
|
neat composition. it looks like a very nice park from here.
|
|
0 
