|
|
BILL NAGY
{K:5783} 6/6/2008
|
Thank you for your comment, Erland. BILL NAGY
|
|
|
|
Erland Pillegaard
{K:34147} 6/6/2008
|
Nice use of color
erland
|
|
|
|
|
BILL NAGY
{K:5783} 5/11/2008
|
Alvin, It is a SOLARIZATION. The colors and image are not suppose to look natural. BILL NAGY
|
|
|
|
|
Alvin Riesbeck
{K:2751} 5/11/2008
|
Bill Not too wild about this one, too much green for a sunset. But I will say it sure is different. OH! The green is trees, That makes sense now. Cheers Alvin
|
|
|
|
Michele Carlsen
{K:146013} 5/9/2008
|
Ohhhhhh wow Bill I see now for sure and I really like this image as it is too :))
Thank You for the demonstration - so to speak I love to learn photography :))
|
|
|
|
|
Michele Carlsen
{K:146013} 5/9/2008
|
I was wrong with my guess Bill - but I do understand !
|
|
|
|
|
BILL NAGY
{K:5783} 5/9/2008
|
Hi Again Michele, I am attaching the original photo so you can get a better idea of what I did. BILL
|
|
|
|
|
|
BILL NAGY
{K:5783} 5/9/2008
|
Hi Michele, Those are trees in the foreground. BILL
|
|
|
|
|
Michele Carlsen
{K:146013} 5/9/2008
|
Thank You so much for the explanation Bill - I really appreciate it ! It makes perfect sence to me - You did a great job of explaining :))
I would guess to be what it sort of looks like then - flowers in the forground with the depth of the sky on top :)) Am I close ?
|
|
|
|
|
BILL NAGY
{K:5783} 5/9/2008
|
Hi Michele, thank you for commenting. Now sit back and listen; solarization started back in the days of B&W photography. It was done during the print or negative developing process by exposing the print or negative to bright light partially through the process and then continuing the developing resulting in a partially negative and partially postive photo. Make any sense? BILL
|
|
|
|
|
Michele Carlsen
{K:146013} 5/9/2008
|
Very creative and interesting Bill !!!! You are very artistic and creative - I love the colors so very rich !! I do not know much about this 'SOLARIZED' photography but I really like it !
Best Wishes,
Michele~
|
|
0 
