|
|
Shirley D. Cross-Taylor
{K:174133} 8/5/2007
|
That is a very good idea, Eb. I look forward to seeing the results of that experiment.:)
|
|
|
|
Eb Mueller
{K:24960} 8/5/2007
|
It seems that your comment has posed a bit of challenge for me to work on, Shirley. I may be able to change the perspective to fisheye or ultra wide and see what kind of results I get. I do know that, regardless of lens, the same magnification on the sensor plane will result in the same depth of field.
Eb
|
|
|
|
|
Shirley D. Cross-Taylor
{K:174133} 8/4/2007
|
I know, I know...all those complications....lol.:)))
|
|
|
|
Marcelo Berraz
{K:12906} 8/4/2007
|
Hermosas "radiaciones" Eb!!:M.
|
|
|
|
|
Eb Mueller
{K:24960} 8/4/2007
|
You are right Shirley! The only way to get more in focus would be to make a composite from many exposures. There is software available, but expensive. Might be difficult, under most conditions, to be able to register some 30 exposures when taken outdoors. The other option (just occured to me) is a pin-hole "lens." The effect is usually soft focus 'though and wind still conditions are required.
Eb
|
|
|
|
|
Shirley D. Cross-Taylor
{K:174133} 8/4/2007
|
What a wonderfully different viewpoint of this blossom. Wish there were some way you could have had a little more of it in focus, but still very good.:)
|
|
0 
