|
|
Doyle D. Chastain
{K:101119} 3/20/2007
|
Thanks very much Michele . . . almost didn't see your comment on this ancient shot . . . LoL! We said the same things, I think . . . you see the comparison? Anyway . . . this was my first award on this site! :)
Regards,
Doyle I <~~~~~
|
|
|
|
Michele Carlsen
{K:146013} 3/14/2007
|
I love this Doyle !! The image says waaay more than the words do in this case--- so this leaves you really not needing to write as much--- as Yu showed MORE--- Excellent !! I am so glad my 'Anyway' about reminded You of this ! What an honor-- Hey and You got a righteous DOD award! Beautfiul my friend , beautiful !!!
Best wishes,
Michele~
|
|
|
|
|
Doyle D. Chastain
{K:101119} 5/1/2006
|
Thanks Mireille! I appreciate you taking the time to look and comment!
Regards,
Doyle I <-----
|
|
|
|
Mireille Heirendt
{K:7258} 4/30/2006
|
Congratulations on the great presentation and focus points! Excellent idea, Doyle!
Mireille
|
|
|
|
|
Doyle D. Chastain
{K:101119} 4/27/2006
|
Thanks Joćo - very nice of you to comment!
Regards,
Doyle I <-----
|
|
|
|
Joćo F * Photography
{K:41945} 4/27/2006
|
Congratulations for this combo and a well deserved award!
joćo
|
|
|
|
|
Doyle D. Chastain
{K:101119} 4/27/2006
|
Thanks Mary . . . that's quite kind of you!! I appreciate your comments and you need not worry, you'll get used to the UF community and the way things work with time. It certainly will give you some things to think about and will likely improve your skills in this medium. It's also a good place to try out new ideas. Quite frankly, the whole thing is still kind of new to me too.
Regards,
Doyle I <-----
|
|
|
|
|
Doyle D. Chastain
{K:101119} 4/27/2006
|
Thanks Roberto! Very kind of you (as always)!
Regards,
Doyle I <-----
|
|
|
|
|
Mary Slade
{K:40338} 4/27/2006
|
Doyle, system still new to me, so not so sure of things....but just seen your name on the front page! Brill! You should have a page all over the place for your free spirit!
|
|
|
|
Roberto Arcari Farinetti
{K:209486} 4/27/2006
|
oh.. Doyle..
a marvelous sequence idea.. i like it and i'm hapy for the DOD deserved it!
roby
7
|
|
|
|
|
Doyle D. Chastain
{K:101119} 4/27/2006
|
Thanks for the well thought out critiques you have provided me from time to time . . . I will be reading up on my new software and hope to master it soon. I will also be returning to the lighthouse.
I appreciate and thank you for the congratulations and agree that the tech points are good front page material . . . informative in an especially pertinent venue (i.e., visually). I agree about the bright spots likely to be the better choice image-wise, however, in this presentation . . . the point is made and many prefer the other image. When all is said and done - it's still a preference issue! Stay in touch my friend.
Regards,
Doyle I <-----
|
|
|
|
|
Doyle D. Chastain
{K:101119} 4/27/2006
|
Thanks Marian!
Regards,
Doyle I <-----
|
|
|
|
|
Doyle D. Chastain
{K:101119} 4/27/2006
|
Thank you Riny! Very kind comments like yours are always welcome.
Regards,
Doyle I <-----
|
|
|
|
|
Doyle D. Chastain
{K:101119} 4/27/2006
|
Thank you Erik . . . very kind of you to say.
Regards,
Doyle I <-----
|
|
|
|
AJ Miller
{K:49168} 4/27/2006
|
Hi Doyle. My understanding is that Unsharp Mask "masks" lack of sharpness by sharpening mid and high contrast edges only and without adding any noise to the image. It requires a little more input from the user but has a more controllable effect. I'm still experimenting with it but I think Hugo probably has a point.
I do like the contrast in these two images, and the way a technical point is being put across in the image selected to appear on the front page. Congrats on the award and the interest this presentation is generating!
For me, the image on the right works better. I think this is because the eyes are drawn first to the "bright spots" ie. the flowers, and in the left image these are not the focal points.
John
|
|
|
|
Marian Man
{K:80636} 4/27/2006
|
congratulations dear Doyle for making front page!!!!!!!!!!
Marian
|
|
|
|
Riny Koopman
{K:102911} 4/27/2006
|
Gongratulations for Featured Donor! WELL DESERVED!! KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK DOYLE. RINY
|
|
|
|
Erik Neldner
{K:10846} 4/27/2006
|
nice one! love this idea.
|
|
|
|
|
Doyle D. Chastain
{K:101119} 4/25/2006
|
Thanks Marian . . . 
Regards,
Doyle I <-----
|
|
|
|
|
Marian Man
{K:80636} 4/25/2006
|
wow!!!! well deserved award dear Doyle!!!!
congratulations!!!!!
Marian
|
|
|
|
|
Doyle D. Chastain
{K:101119} 4/25/2006
|
..........Thanks Ray!...........
My friend, I really appreciate the kind comments!
Regards,
Doyle I <-----
|
|
|
|
|
Doyle D. Chastain
{K:101119} 4/25/2006
|
Thanks Mary! This was the perfect image to illustrate the comment.
Regards,
Doyle I <-----
|
|
|
|
|
Doyle D. Chastain
{K:101119} 4/25/2006
|
Thanks Nessa . . . They both seem good to me (hence the presentation idea). Appreciate your comment though . . . so far, the voting is tied as to which is best.
Regards,
Doyle I <-----
|
|
|
|
|
Doyle D. Chastain
{K:101119} 4/25/2006
|
Thanks Riny . . . You're VERY kind!
Regards,
Doyle I <-----
|
|
|
|
|
Doyle D. Chastain
{K:101119} 4/25/2006
|
Thanks Laura - That's what intrigued me most . . . that both had merit. The idea came as to the presentation while considering which was better.
Regards,
Doyle I <-----
|
|
|
|
stingRay pt.4 .
{K:250401} 4/25/2006
|
...............CONGRATULATIONS....................
on a well deserved award my dear friend. This is such a great creative idea Doyle showing the two extremes of dof side by side. Both shots are beautiful and I cannot possibly nominate one over the other as some people have. Well done to you. All the best....Ray
|
|
|
|
|
Mary Slade
{K:40338} 4/25/2006
|
This is a brilliant image and idea Doyle. You got it in five words- "beauty is where you are looking"! To capture the number of different visions just one individual has with mood is impossible- varies all the time. So I'd want the lot!
|
|
|
|
vanessa shakesheff
{K:68840} 4/25/2006
|
Like the comparison of the two shots.do like the second one more.and congrats on your award.nessa
|
|
|
|
|
Riny Koopman
{K:102911} 4/25/2006
|
Gongrats for such beauty Doyle,Has going to my favorites,All my best wishes from sunny Amsterdam
Riny
|
|
|
|
Laura Spell
{K:24080} 4/25/2006
|
Very good DOF study! The images both have merit. I think I like the one with the foreground blurred.
|
|
|
|
|
Doyle D. Chastain
{K:101119} 4/24/2006
|
Thank you Kambiz.
Regards,
Doyle I <-----
|
|
|
|
|
Doyle D. Chastain
{K:101119} 4/24/2006
|
Thanks Hugo . . . I'm not clear on the advice and would dearly love to know what you mean. The image is, indeed, a tad soft. Unsharpen mask would do the trick? I'm not sure what that is . . . Sharpen selective or blur selective I might follow . . . but wouldn't sharpening add noise? You could e-mail me (see profile) if you'd like to offer more on this - and thanks so much for the critique.
Regards,
Doyle I <-----
|
|
|
|
Kambiz K
{K:37420} 4/24/2006
|
not bad artistic workshop
|
|
|
|
Hugo de Wolf
{K:185110} 4/24/2006
|
Hi Doyle, Love this change in focus point, and even more so to see them together. It's something I shoot regularly, but never actually placed side to side. Great idea! One small nitpicky thing, this one, as well as the large pano photo looks just a tad soft. A minor Unsharpne mask would do the trick, I believe.
Last thing, I also like this prsentation...:)
Cheers,
Hugo
|
|
0 
