|
|
Claude Lussier
{K:4626} 10/19/2005
|
Very colorful and beautiful of this fabulous butterfly, well done Mark.
|
|
|
|
Gary Dyck
{K:12834} 10/17/2005
|
beautiful!!
|
|
|
|
p e t a .
{K:18700} 10/16/2005
|
ah yes, come to think of it you are way behind...you've missed some saucy ones, some macro's and cityscapes!
|
|
|
|
Mark Mahar
{K:3233} 10/16/2005
|
Thanks Peta! Your macros are amazing, I appreciate the comment. I'll have to get over your way soon, I've been neglecting my friends! (Too much travel) Cheers,
-mm
|
|
|
|
|
Mark Mahar
{K:3233} 10/16/2005
|
There are a couple factors here that make for a sharp photo. Yes the lens is definitely one factor. It's an older Nikkor AF 75-210mm 1:4-5.6.
It's not the "D" version as I did not need the flash distance info and it's harder to find used. It's from 1993. The most important factors were time of day (early morning light from the side) and tripod with cable release. I just waited till the Monarch was fairly still and snapped away! Thanks,
-mm
|
|
|
|
|
Debby Biri
{K:4775} 10/16/2005
|
Mark - a very sharp image, indeed. Great work.
|
|
|
|
Eleisa Martin
{K:2569} 10/16/2005
|
Very beautiful picture Mark. I love the clearity and sharpness of this photo.
What lens did you use? I've been looking for a good one?
Eleisa
|
|
|
|
|
p e t a .
{K:18700} 10/16/2005
|
wow Mark, beautiful image!
|
|
0 
