|
|
|
James Hager
{K:6285} 6/14/2005
|
Very nice. Great perspective, and a great composition with the second hand balancing the hour and minute hands. ... The "distortion" Leanna was talking about looks like a reflection from something bright on the ceiling. It's especially noticeable in front of the clock case. I probably wouldn't have noticed it if she hadn't mentioned it.
|
|
|
|
|
Bunnie Chamberlain
{K:443} 6/10/2005
|
Morgan, oh my gosh I love this shot!!! Made me laugh right out loud!! I'm sitting here at my work with nothing to do....looking at the clock...when it's time to go home!!!
Bunnie
|
|
|
|
Morgan Estill
{K:3786} 6/10/2005
|
What distortion? There isn't any distortion other than the DOF. The lens was also perfectly clean (and is very high quality). There is slight glare for the glass cover, but that's only on the lower right corner.
|
|
|
|
|
Leanne Johnson
{K:80} 6/10/2005
|
That doesn't explain the distortion on the outside of the clock, it looks like there was something on your lens or there was too much light there.
|
|
|
|
|
Morgan Estill
{K:3786} 6/9/2005
|
It's out of focus, those numbers are of the "depth of field" (DOF). I set the aperature fairly open which gives it a thinner DOF. Had the aperature been set smaller (larger F number), the DOF would have been larger. I wanted some of the number out of focus. So I did. :)
|
|
|
|
|
Leanne Johnson
{K:80} 6/9/2005
|
It's okay, you should do more working...I'm paying for this picture right now. Can you make it look like a Dali painting? That would be cool. What is the distortion over the one on the twelve?
|
|
|
|
|
Judy Bodden
{K:1694} 6/9/2005
|
Hee hee hee.. that's how I feel most of the time. =)
|
|
0 
