|
NN
{K:26787} 11/6/2004
|
Yes, a bit dark perhaps. But the sky is just gorgeus, and emphasized in Hugo?s version, which I prefer.
Thanks for your comments!
|
|
|
altur .
{K:6087} 11/5/2004
|
Hi Hugo! Thanks for your suggestion... yes, I think it's a bit better the way you croped it, the trees to the left were maybe too much, but in this way the photo doesn't have the same "deep perspective" because of loosing a part of the road. Anyway, thanks again. As about the "darkness", yes, a filter would have helped, or using a tripod and taking 2 different pics with different exposure.
|
|
|
Hugo de Wolf
{K:185110} 11/5/2004
|
Hi Altur, I agree it's a bit too dark, but the colours in the sky are excellent. There's a bit too much peripheral information in this shot to fully appreciate that, though. I think you could emphasise the skyscape by either cropping the image (per attached) or by zooming in a bit more.
Cheers,
Hugo
|
|
|
|
Jani Salvataggio
{K:27283} 11/3/2004
|
very very beautiful!!!!
Regards Jani
|
|
|
Teunis Haveman
{K:53426} 11/3/2004
|
Altur, you have right Beautiful sky Teunis
|
|
|
Roberto Arcari Farinetti
{K:209486} 11/3/2004
|
hello a perfect stormy day! wonderful roby
|
|
|
Geoff Simmons
{K:264} 11/3/2004
|
Lovely... this definately fits into "moody landscape"
If you could have used a graduated neutral-density filter, you could have gotten a lttle more detail on the ground...
I really like the clarity of the rays of light
|
|