|
|
|
Rawabi Al-Nuaimi
{K:15659} 6/16/2004
|
it looks great Peter.. :)
|
|
|
|
Ned Ali
{K:11928} 6/15/2004
|
i like this photo. there's a nice balance of the building and the sky.
very successful b&w.
the resolution is a bit low but it looks sharp through out.
regards,
ned
|
|
|
|
Peter Daniel
{K:33866} 6/15/2004
|
I loaded this from home and may have saved the pixels at 75 dpi... Here's one at 300 dpi... Is it any better....
|
Bowed building 300dpi |
|
|
|
|
Peter Daniel
{K:33866} 6/15/2004
|
I beleive the bowing look was from the lighting. Where the dark is in the center and lighter on the edges. If you look around the photo the bowing changes. I was trying to achieve the Optical Illusion...
Like the one below.... Are all the rectangles Parallel. The more you look at it they seem to change. The non Parallel lines at the top and the angle have an effect. Just take your eye and try to draw a line down the top or bottom line of the rectangles and see if seems to change.
I like to try and find Optical Illusions...
Thanks for all your comments...
Peter
|
Are They Parallel? |
|
|
|
Paul's Photos
{K:35235} 6/15/2004
|
nice perspective.. like the angle.. seems to be some noise in the sky.. good work
|
|
|
|
|
Rawabi Al-Nuaimi
{K:15659} 6/15/2004
|
great composition but a bit pixalized.. resized? nice tones :)
|
|
|
|
Teunis Haveman
{K:53426} 6/15/2004
|
Peter, beautiful Building
Teunis
|
|
|
|
|
Nicklas Tininenko
{K:57} 6/15/2004
|
The bowing is from lens distortion (barrel?) combined with natural convergence that comes from looking up at the building...architectural photography is especially cruel if you're attempting to get a perfectly straight shot. As your camera has only a fixed lens, it's something you should try to learn to play with to your advantage...
|
|
0 
