|
|
Sava Savic
{K:326} 7/12/2004
|
Hi LARA, This picture is very crative, moon is the real moon!
|
|
|
|
Carol Cefalu
{K:8388} 6/14/2004
|
beautiful and mysterious...
|
|
|
|
Jim Loy
{K:31373} 6/5/2004
|
Look at you stirring up all the talk tonight! Good job! If ya gotta bring out all the talkers, this is the photo to do it.
JIL
|
|
|
|
|
Jeff Cartwright
{K:52046} 6/4/2004
|
Hi!...Paul: Excellent Creative Photograph!...Until I read yor Comment...I could Not Make out the other Objects, Now I Know!...They Enhance the Picture...Great Presentation...Paul!!!
Regards:
Jeff.
Thank you, Paul! for your Comment For: As Time Goes By! Reply Comment by Paul Lara Jun 4, 2004
I just love dilapidated houses, Jeff.
There's always so much texture and...attitude.
Nice shot!...I'm always Lokking for this Sort of View!......Jeff!!!
|
|
|
|
Paul Lara
{K:88111} 6/4/2004
|
I'll burn it in a little, and see how that looks.
Thanks for the feedback, Kristina.
|
|
|
|
|
Kristina Kohut
{K:49990} 6/4/2004
|
Such hard questions you come up with! :-))
The composition is great, but when I look I feel that my eyes are dragged towards that top light all the time. But I think it's more because light is so much stronger than light in moon.
|
|
|
|
|
Paul Lara
{K:88111} 6/4/2004
|
All three are lights in the parking lot.
So, do you think it makes a better composition without the top light? I kept it in, in order to have a 3-point line that is broken or ascended by the moon's angle.
|
|
|
|
|
Kristina Kohut
{K:49990} 6/4/2004
|
Wow this is so beautiful! How fantastic light and so perfect details! I can really see the famous "man in the moon" so clearly!
The other things, are they UFO's or street lights or what are they? I love the bottom two, but the one on top feels distracting.
|
|
|
|
|
Paul Lara
{K:88111} 6/4/2004
|
Thank you, Antonella!
I'm growing fond of it myself. ;)
|
|
|
|
Kevin H
{K:22502} 6/4/2004
|
This is so simple yet very cool. To me it looks like the lamp post are flying saucers. Keep up the good work.
|
|
|
|
|
Antonella Nistri
{K:21867} 6/4/2004
|
My Gosh,Paul,this is incredible....this photo is far-out!!!!! Cannot find the words,wowwwwww!!!! 10 +++++++++++++++ Antonella
|
|
|
|
|
Enjoy
{K:16125} 6/4/2004
|
WOW this is very unique and looks almost unreal...well seen!!!!
|
|
|
|
Matej Maceas
{K:24381} 6/4/2004
|
Hugo, I read on several occasions that the correct exposure for the moon is 1/ISO at f/11.
|
|
|
|
Hugo de Wolf
{K:185110} 6/4/2004
|
Thanks for the info! That's what I needed, It falls into perspective perfectly> I appreciate your help!
Cheers,
Hugo
|
|
|
|
João Magalhães
{K:2067} 6/4/2004
|
Hugo, the moon is a sunlit object, hence follows the "sunny 16" rule. Should there still be 125 ASA films, it would be correctly exposed at 1/125 s, f/16 (correction is required with 100 ASA, of course.) Obviously that underexposes all the rest, at least after sunset, and provided you don't use auxiliary lighting.
|
|
|
|
|
Al S
{K:5131} 6/4/2004
|
Hi Paul
Awesome! Very creative! Excellent idea, really well executed!
Cheers
Alan
|
|
|
|
|
Hugo de Wolf
{K:185110} 6/4/2004
|
Hi Paul, very good shot. I like the title, and I'm glad you didn't go for a perfect alignment....;o) Very creative, and very well exposed. I've been "shooting at the moon" recently too, and foud it very difficult to get it done properly. By how many shots did you overexpose? My D100 needs at least a -4EV setting to capture the details. Anything less overexposes it. In this shot, with the alignment of the street lamps, it puzzles me, as I presume the lights were much brighter... Intriguing shot, and well composed!
Cheers,
Hugo
|
|
0 
