|
|
|
Julie Goerler
{K:397} 3/21/2006
|
I like how the bridge recides into the background fog. The flow of the bridge really makes your eyes travel into the image. Also like the perspective.
Julie
|
|
|
|
Serge Moscow
{K:-2917} 11/17/2004
|
Philosophical view
|
|
|
|
Tony Diana
{K:13396} 8/25/2004
|
Estupenda imagen, saludos
|
|
|
|
|
Hulusi Sogutlu
{K:171} 7/24/2004
|
congraluations! I like it very much. as a civil engineer, I' m proud!
|
|
|
|
|
Lori Stitt
{K:75282} 7/22/2004
|
Great leading lines in this image.
Very well composed. Love fog photos.
Lori L)
|
|
|
|
cerebral marv
{K:217} 7/7/2004
|
mysterious feeling!!
|
|
|
|
|
Marce
{K:1331} 6/12/2004
|
lovely!
|
|
|
|
|
kathleen fonseca
{K:11992} 5/6/2004
|
oh yeah, ok, then i guess you have a bit of color cast here too if you scanned the print. Well that explains it and actually, the image survived rather well considering! It must be unbelievably nice in its physical form.
as to scans, i had negs scanned for the first time the other day and i'm very disappointed and distressed. i'm going to a better lab to do them again and see what happens. i've just started shooting film and i don't know s--t from Cheyanne! :)) thanks for the reply..kat~
|
|
|
|
|
Tom Ross
{K:6453} 5/6/2004
|
Kathleen, yes this was a reflective scan of the color print not of the negative as it should have been. I have a habit of scanning the print I get from the lab when it is balanced to my taste. I usually loose something when I do that. I should scan the negative and start from scratch as I would in black and white.
|
|
|
|
|
kathleen fonseca
{K:11992} 5/6/2004
|
i like how you framed this one, Tom..the bridge curves perfectly through the image area and i love that it disappears into the mist before it comes to the physical limits of the photograph. The flatness really expresses the weather conditions when you shot this and i like that as well.
i do wish for just a little more contrast in the bricks of the bridge support and only because they're in the immediate foreground and practically merge with the reflection in the water resulting in a large dark form that is very heavy for the wispy misty lightness of the rest of the image. But looking closer, what i'm thinking is that these tones are so delicate that your scan probably killed the subtlety..am i right? i am just starting to shoot with film and having scanning problems so i've got scan on the brain..but my biggest problem is the subtle tonal variations seem to deteriorate in the conversion of analog to digital. But i'm after solutions so i'll keep trying. So glad i found your portfolio, Tom! kat~
|
|
|
|
|
Gerhard F
{K:2820} 3/10/2004
|
phantastic capture! congrats
|
|
|
|
|
Timothy R
{K:3028} 3/10/2004
|
I agree... great mood!
|
|
|
|
Roy V
{K:13082} 3/10/2004
|
Tom,
Strong and Beautiful! Excellent framing and mood....
Great Photo
Roy
|
|
|
|
CorrieLynn Jacobsen
{K:9882} 3/10/2004
|
beautiful! the exposure is perfect. It has a very "moody"feel, i like it! welldone!-corrie
|
|
|
|
|
john amore
{K:14015} 3/10/2004
|
Moody a little mystery to make ones mind wander great job John
|
|
0 
