|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 12/18/2008
|
Waiting impatiently for that, Roger!
Nick
|
|
|
|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 12/18/2008
|
Thanks once more, Gustavo!
I guess you should start being a bit more eclectic. Everything I post is "great"?
Cheers!
Nick
|
|
|
|
Roger Skinner
{K:81846} 12/18/2008
|
hehe rightio Nick I will the job on the list
|
|
|
|
Gustavo Scheverin
{K:164501} 12/17/2008
|
Otro abstracto muy interesante de agradables tonos, bien balanceados.
Un abrazo y felices fiestas!
|
|
|
|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 12/17/2008
|
Exactly, Roger. Same principle.
It would be nice to see some of those slides - but not really "for a laugh". Such images can be also very intersting.
Cheers!
Nick
|
|
|
|
|
Roger Skinner
{K:81846} 12/15/2008
|
ahh I see like making a time exposure from a floating boat at night of the Sydney Opera House or holding the camera out the window of the car whilst you drive past a building with a big neon sign on the top eh... one day I will find those negs and colour slide (they date from the late 70's)and put them up for a laugh...
|
|
|
|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 12/15/2008
|
You are absolutely right considering the strictest definition of it, Roger. About the "inventor" there are many different versions of the story, but about the technique itself this is the strictest definition.
Soon after rotating many thought of different motions of the camera. Translations, oscillations, whatever. The name remained as a general description of "writing with light", which somehow relates to the traces that the light leaves on the film/CCD while the camera is moving with an open shutter.
So, here it was a "wavy" movement from top right to bottom left with the shutter remaining open for some more milliseconds at the end of the movement. I wish I had avoided that since this staying at that position allowed also the not as well reflecting objects to burn on film. (They need more time for that.)
But for the more "elastic" definition it is also "luxagraphy" - writing with light. You don't move the pencil (light) but rather the paper (camera/film) but this is only coordinates transformation.
Cheers!
Nick
|
|
|
|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 12/15/2008
|
Who is that guy, Harry? And... if he wasn't using even a film then how did the images came out at all? CCD?
Anyway...
Nick
|
|
|
|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 12/14/2008
|
Thank you very much, Aziz!
I see what you mean. I try some more of them with no visible objects other than the softer shapes.
Cheers!
Nick
|
|
|
|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 12/14/2008
|
Oops! What is obscene here, Fabio? Or does your fantasy go through? ;-)
Seriously, it is only some undefinable shape, so... how can it be obscene?
Cheers!
Nick
|
|
|
|
|
Roger Skinner
{K:81846} 12/14/2008
|
hmm I though luxagrphy was invented by James Cook and involved shooting whilst rotating the camera
|
|
|
|
Wolf Zorrito
{K:78768} 12/14/2008
|
You have to talk with Jim Loy, he also is a purist and shoots without film. What about shooting without lens and without film. NO distortiob at all !
;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;)
Harry
|
|
|
|
aZiZ aBc
{K:28345} 12/13/2008
|
nice abstract, ..
Wish there were no "overlap" between white soft shape and the other objects on right bottom !
Health and happiness, ..
Aziz
|
|
|
|
|
Fabio Keiner
{K:81109} 12/13/2008
|
almost obscene !! :)
|
|
0 
