|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 9/4/2008
|
Thanks onnce more, Omid, or Aziz, for the nice comment.
About abstracts and their dependence on what the photographer wanted to do, I just wanted to have nice fresh clear water drops on red. This way the abstract would win much. But as Harry said the reflections got overburned and so the image is lost some good part of what it could have otherwise. The term "abstract" is not necessarily an explanation for less than absolute quality.
Cheers!
Nick
|
|
|
|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 9/2/2008
|
Great!
Let all *%&*£$! travel through the net, Harry!
Cheers!
Nick
|
|
|
|
Omid Az
{K:60} 9/2/2008
|
Abstracts follow different rules !
Almost evrything depends on the opinion and objective of the photographer !
I found no problem on this abstract ! because I believe the above sentence !
Best wishes
Aziz
|
|
|
|
Wolf Zorrito
{K:78768} 9/1/2008
|
OK, well more *^&*( and (&()*)& to come ;-)
Your new version has only slight differences but its about the message. You got it, now use it.
Have you seen
http://www.usefilm.com/Image.asp?ID=1461615
?
Its my first film conversion ( Kodak Gold 200 )
|
|
|
|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 9/1/2008
|
You are neither *(&(* nor *%&£! nor whatever else my keyboard might produce, Harry! There is nothing to excuse at all! Quite the contrary: At last! Some real input here and I am so glad for that, since one main reason for posting this series is exactly that! Input!
So, let's get some work done. Trying to somehow "simulate" your advice, I burned the highlights a bit. It really seems to get better (attachment) though it can't of course reach the look of a correct exposure. But now I know at least a bit more about that for the next time I'll be trying something similar.
Thanks a lot! And more of that please!
Nick
|
Dodged the highlightes a bit after Harry's idea |
|
|
|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 9/1/2008
|
If I only knew what its problems are! It looks... sigh!
Anyway, thank you very much, Aziz!
Cheers!
Nick
|
|
|
|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 9/1/2008
|
Thanks a lot for the nice comment, Mohsen!
Well, I find it OK too but... as with most images of the series I have my doubts about it. Too imperfect for my eyes and I can't say what the problems are.
Cheers!
Nick
|
|
|
|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 8/31/2008
|
Thanks a lot for the nice comment, Aykaan!
The "evolution", however, is not the sequence of postings. This series has been what I was doing many years ago. It is not what I turned to after the previously posted images.
If there is some evolution visible then only *inside* each individual series, but not over the different series I post. So, I do hope that some evolution will be visible too while I post the images of this series.
Cheers!
Nick
|
|
|
|
|
Wolf Zorrito
{K:78768} 8/31/2008
|
I can be a *(&(* sometimes, forgive me, but the highlights are over exposed. A shot at EV-2 and a gamma correction would improve it. I mean it positive.
|
|
|
|
aZiZ aBc
{K:28345} 8/31/2008
|
a very good minimal, ...
Like the tonality and the color
Cheers
Aziz
|
|
|
|
Mohsen Bayramnejad
{K:21377} 8/31/2008
|
Simply creative, amazing and with this simplicity... well done abstract work dear friend!
|
|
|
|
Aykaan K
{K:13601} 8/30/2008
|
bonjour Nick,
l'évolution de ton travail est très intéressant... recherches .. reflexions...
continue mon ami, félicitations...
|
|
0 
