|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 4/14/2008
|
Oh... I understand exactly what you say, Gustavo! I am also a bit sad about that, but what can we do if practical considerations make something so hard to do? And when the city is something as dynamic, as you already said, then I guess that there is not much we can do.
A bit disappointed too. Well, not every ideal is feasible at any time, ey? ;-)
Nick
|
|
|
|
Gustavo Scheverin
{K:164501} 4/13/2008
|
Sin dudas llevar los cables enterrados sería la solución ideal contra la contaminación visual por los horrorosos cables aéreos, pero efectivamente son mucho más caros e implican una muy buena planificación que es muy difícil, y diría yo, casi imposible de hacer en las dinámicas ciudades modernas. Otro datos, es mucho más fácil reparar o modificar un cableado aéreo que otro enterrado...:-)
Un gran abrazo!
Un gran abrazo!
|
|
|
|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 4/13/2008
|
Sigh! Again I forgot the attachment. Sorry Gustavo, here it is.
Nick
|
Cloned off cable and branches in an extension of Gustavo's suggestion |
|
|
|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 4/13/2008
|
This time I also have my problems with the cable, Gustavo, and also with the branches. I did revove them in PS but then the image was quite "strange" to me - I don't know how to describe that better, and so I attach the altered image. Perhaps I am just too *used* to see those cables over streets.
BTW, a question to you as a civil engineer. Perhaps you could say something more about that to me. Is it not better to place such cables for electricity or phone under the earth? If there for example no need for some trolley to access voltage, then why not putting them all in tubes under the earth? Would that be too perhaps expensive, or even dangerous? I came to that question exactly because many times some cables are so problematic for photography.
Cheers!
Nick
|
|
|
|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 4/12/2008
|
Thanks a lot again, Dave! This is exactly what I think about the branches... not much of disturbance and not much of necessity, anyhow. It seems that thete are also some indifferent elements in photography, I guess.
Nick
|
|
|
|
|
Gustavo Scheverin
{K:164501} 4/11/2008
|
ja...ja...:-) la foto es impecable, no le encuentro ninguna objeción!...:-) Luz, composición, POV, hasta el B&W me parece correcto, pero ya que lo pedis, te voy a hacer una observación:...el cable!, ja...ja... no me gustan los cables, y se pueden borrar muy fácil con PS, bueno eso sí, estaríamos poniendo algo de fantasía!...;-)
Un abrazo!
|
|
|
|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 4/11/2008
|
The architecture is surely nice, I know that already!
What about the *image* of the architecture? Here I am in bad need of help, Gustavo! What about the branches? The distorted perspectibe due to wide angle? The compositions?
Help!
Nick
|
|
|
|
Dave Stacey
{K:150877} 4/11/2008
|
Nicely done shot of this corner building, Nick! You could probably do without the branches, but they don't bother me too much!
Dave.
|
|
|
|
|
Gustavo Scheverin
{K:164501} 4/10/2008
|
Muy buena la perspectiva y la composición, buenos detalles de una arquitectura muy bella.
Felicitaciones!
|
|
0 
