|
M jalili
{K:69009} 4/5/2008
|
All regards my friend ..........................
|
|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 4/5/2008
|
I am glad that you say that, Yazeed, since it supports the hint from Visar, to include more of the building's wall at the right. So, this way it would continue to be not centered and also with a better composition.
Great to see when the puzzle gets solved piece after piece!
Nick
|
|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 4/5/2008
|
Oh yes, yes, of course, a bad choise of angle/composition but the sun was too strong, and I was hungry, and my feet were aching, and the kids were screaming, and the tourists were pushing me here and there, and I was in a hurry too, and so it was not my fault. ;-) We read that everyday, don't we, Visar?
Seriously, I was definitely not in a hurry, Visar, but rather in some mental state that was simply not sufficient for a good composition. In other words, my fault and no need for cheap excuses. So I am grateful to you for telling me how this could have been made better. I think that the inclusion of more of the side of the church would really be much better than to crop it off image as it is now. And imagine that the side of the building was visually completely accessible! So I pretty much missed (and messed) it.
Indeed, I'll have to retry this! Perhaps a whole series of that church, too. There is definitely more than enough stuff to study there.
Thanks a *bunch*!!!
Nick
|
|
|
M jalili
{K:69009} 4/4/2008
|
Yes, perhaps there is little of this. But I like things not symmetrical . Yours Yazeed
|
|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 4/4/2008
|
Oh well, with its compositiun problems at the right and the top. But thanks agaon for the nice comment, Yazeed!
Nick
|
|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 4/4/2008
|
It is quite obvious that it is a work of art, Gustavi, which therefore I hope the image itself manages to present in a nice way despite the composition problems at the right and the top of the image.
Thanks a lot!
Nick
|
|
|
absynthius .
{K:20748} 4/4/2008
|
hey Nick, you're right this image is a bit overexposed- but all these details there, they must make a devil hard shot to take. however, i would not mind that, as the white is dominant in the canvas, as much as i would mind angle that it is taken. I think it handicapped the shot! that is because if we want to balance the photo with a crop then we will lose the right of it- and my taste does not allow that despite the fact there is much to see in front only. therefore a shot irrepearable. i only wish there was a bit more taken of the building on the right, that way depth would be generated and a perspective attractive to the eye, adding to it the great details the building contains i think it would be great. you seem to have been in a hurry Nick, but, maybe next time. :)
cheers, v.
|
|
|
M jalili
{K:69009} 4/3/2008
|
Really amazing my dear . Regards ...............
|
|
|
Gustavo Scheverin
{K:164501} 4/3/2008
|
Interesantísimos detalles, una obra de arte! Felicitaciones!
|
|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 4/3/2008
|
And some needed crops I guess. Thanks a lot agaon, Claudia!
Nick
|
|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 4/3/2008
|
Yep! And while I tried that crop it became also obvious to me that after a crop of the right another crop was needed of the top. Or so I see it. (Attachment) Strange how merciless I can get when it comes to cropping. Perhaps I am unable to tolerate any hint for "the world outside the main subject" when it comes to focusing on some given subject particularly.. :-/
Many many thanks again, Dave!
Nick
|
Cropped right side after Dave's idae, and then top after my own impression |
|
|
Claudia Perilli
{K:31090} 4/2/2008
|
Nice details, nice crop.
Claudia
|
|
|
Dave Stacey
{K:150877} 4/2/2008
|
Good capture of the details here, Nick! I agree a little crop on the right might help. Dave.
|
|