|
|
Quix Photography
{K:20204} 12/5/2006
|
Thanks Dave
You can't get Exif info from a photo that has been digitally edited... the process eradicates all the previous details.
The shutter speed here was 8 seconds & aperture 5.7. ISO speed 100. Seemed to work quite well for these ones :)
Sorry, I never think to post this info.. maybe should start & it will help me notice what's giving me the best results x
|
|
|
|
|
Quix Photography
{K:20204} 12/5/2006
|
Not sure how well that would work as I had to zoom right in to get this shot. A thought for if I was closer though.
Thanks for all your comments Dave.. always nice to hear from you.
Hope you are keeping well & bright :) x
|
|
|
|
Dave Stacey
{K:150877} 12/4/2006
|
You've caught the various window grills and treatments, Sue, but maybe a little fill flash would be enough to establish some context with the outside of the building, without overpowering the sense of darkness and lighted windows.
Dave.
|
|
|
|
|
Mary Slade
{K:40338} 12/4/2006
|
Beautiful lighting- so strong and warm- lovely different colours.
|
|
|
|
|
Dave Dixon
{K:2035} 12/4/2006
|
Nice and sharp.
I'd be interested to know what the shutter speed ,aperture, etc. settings were for this. You didn't post that info with the image, and the .jpg file doesn't have any Exif info in it that I can read.
|
|
|
|
Shirley D. Cross-Taylor
{K:174145} 12/3/2006
|
I understand, dear Sue.:)
|
|
|
|
|
Quix Photography
{K:20204} 12/3/2006
|
Thanks for the idea Shirley, unfortunately this display only takes place between 5 & 10 so, at this time of year, dusk is not possible :(
|
|
|
|
|
Shirley D. Cross-Taylor
{K:174145} 12/3/2006
|
Interesting, Sue. It would be better to take this at dusk, so that more detail would show.:)
|
|
0 
