|
|
Bill Long
{K:3306} 3/14/2007
|
I guess it is a bit strange and after more than 103 years, it's proven to be a bit fragile -- at least the facade. It was one of the first buildings in NYC with a steel frame.
I think that one of my favorite buildings, which actually predates the Flat Iron, is the building with the 2-story cupola and gold dome to the right. Absolutely beautiful and maticulously cared for.
Thanks for you interesting comment. Regards, Bill
|
|
|
|
|
Bill Long
{K:3306} 3/14/2007
|
Interesting observation, Doyle. Initially it didn't bother me. Although it was my first time working with this particular camera, and I had a very good tripod, what appears to have caused the shimmer in the lights was the newly paved cross street - 23rd St. to be exact. Speed bump effect.
Thanks again for your comment and interest, Bill.
|
|
|
|
Michalis P.S.
{K:10136} 11/29/2006
|
Very impressive shot.
Well done,
Michalis
|
|
|
|
John-Eric Lemieux
{K:3045} 11/29/2006
|
Very nice picture, great tone, awsome work!
J.E.
|
|
|
|
Doyle D. Chastain
{K:101119} 11/28/2006
|
Bill this is impressive indeed. The atmosphere here feels very much like a dawn and the colors are spot-on perfect! The leftside red light traffic streak wobbles . . . not due to you but likely due to the traffic movement . . . seem a tad distracting to me because the smooth straight light trails seem more photogenic and the bumpy ones suggest a shake . . . either of the light or the camera. Longer shutter speeds smooth the line but they throw off other aspercts like the exposure and traffic lights. So really, there's no answer to that . . . other than luck. This is very impressive work.
|
|
|
|
|
sascha jonack
{K:19715} 11/28/2006
|
Very nice architecture Capture. Very well taken.
Cheers Sascha
|
|
|
|
Billy Bloggs
{K:51043} 11/28/2006
|
It's a strange bit of architecture and looks a little fragile, sitting there on it's own.
Regards, Gary
|
|
|
|
Alan Shaffer
{K:5873} 11/28/2006
|
Beautiful, thanks for posting such a nice image!
-Al
|
|
0 
