|
|
Paul Lara
{K:88111} 3/2/2006
|
Wow, thanks for the warning, Sal.
I had been eyeing that Canon 10-20mm EF-S but thought the Sigma would probably be just as good.
It's more expensive, but still within my budget.
I think you convinced me, man.
|
|
|
|
|
Salvatore Rossignolo
{K:13559} 3/2/2006
|
NO! Stop! Canon! Only Canon! I sent my Sigma 70-200mm f2.8 back. I talked to alot of photographers at the PMA and played with every thing. Save up and buy only Canon glass L series if possible. I'll tell you a story. I gor the Sigma 70-200mm f2.8 to replace my Sigma 70-300 mm so I needed a 2x tele converter so I got the Sigma converter and at 400mm the images were blured and unusable. The I order a Canon 2x converter and it wouldn't fit! Talk about POed. I've never read or heard a negative about even the cheeper canon lenses. I've got the Canon 70-200mm on the way I'll keep you posted. Look, http://consumer.usa.canon.com/ir/controller?act=ModelDetailAct&fcategoryid=148&modelid=10510 Sal
|
|
|
|
|
Paul Lara
{K:88111} 3/2/2006
|
Cool shot, Sal. I'm getting ready to pick up the Sigma 10mm lens! Hope you had fun.
|
|
|
|
|
So Cal Photograhper
{K:18529} 3/2/2006
|
Great photo - wish I was there myself.
Is this a new fisheye lens you got or something you put on your camera while at the Sigma counter. I notice it's the closest in the photo.
Lisa G
|
|
|
|
Marian Man
{K:80636} 3/1/2006
|
yes!!! I was in a place like this a few weeks ago!!!!!! (we finally got a big mall in Athens!!!) and it was just great!!!!!!
fine image dear Sal!!!! great effect and fine colors!!!
my very best regards
Marian
|
|
0 
