|
|
|
Bob Tilden
{K:1085} 6/28/2003
|
Got all of the elements of a very good landscape. Alone but not lonley; wish I was there.
|
|
|
|
|
Dawna G.
{K:7709} 12/29/2002
|
missed this one earlier - welcome to usefilm Harry!
Beautiful image, and I do like Bill's alterations to the image - I am not normally encouraging of such major cloning, but the image has such potential - I think the boarder is too small/in the shadows/blending with the treeline to carry off any significance. Hope to see more :)
|
|
|
|
|
John Charlton
{K:5595} 12/29/2002
|
I was looking at this earlier, but was waiting to hear your response to the alternate version.
I agree with both Thibault and Bill about the boarder. I also agree that the boarder gives the image scale and that's important too.
But you've got such a great image here and that boarder is just in the wrong place at the wrong time. If only you had waited another second or two so that the boarder were isolated against the snow of the hill. Taking him out or even moving him might seem drastic, but unless you got another version of this scene, that may be your best bet.
|
|
|
|
|
harry reid
{K:73} 12/29/2002
|
thanks bill-interesting thought and you may be right but
i felt the boarder gave some perspective to the mountains
and scene beyond.
|
|
|
|
Bill Krul
{K:5597} 12/29/2002
|
Sorry I forgot to check the box. Added a bit of contrast as an afterthought.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bill Krul
{K:5597} 12/29/2002
|
Great photo but I found the boarder to be distracting, somewhat an intruder on an otherwise magnificent scene. I removed the boarder. What do you think?
|
|
|
|
|
Thibault Grouas
{K:848} 12/28/2002
|
This is a nice landscape as it is however the loneliness of the boarder is not the feeling I'll remember about the picture. He is in the shadow and is barely visible compared to the places lit by the sun.
|
|
0 
