Canon 100mm EF macro..... OR..... 60mm EF-S macro

Ian C.	Radovan M.	Sta L.	Gary O.	andrew r.	Jan S.	Jill B.	Art M.

	Sign Up Now! \| Log In \| Help
	Your photo sharing community!

	Your Photo Art Is Not Just A Fleeting Moment In Social Media imageopolis is dedicated to the art and craft of photography! Upload your photos. Award recipients are chosen daily.
Click above to buy imageopolis art for your home or office.	Read About Awards, Featured Critiques and Comments - Click HERE
Check Out Today's Uploads - Click HERE Check Out Timeless Photos From The Past - Click HERE

Share On

Photography Forum: Nature Photography Forum:

Q. Canon 100mm EF macro..... OR..... 60mm EF-S macro

Asked by Nathan Gillies (K=1011) on 4/23/2006

Which do ppl prefer as i am currently trying to choose between them.

davide lupo-pasini (K=8079) - Comment Date 4/24/2006

Hi, Nathan!
just my two cents...
i don't know almost nothing about the 60mm, because of the EF-S mount
if i well remember, this mount don't fit on my cameras (10D, 1V, eos 3)and there's a risk for the mirror (am i wrong?)
but i'm a fully satisfied owner of an ef 100mm 2.8 usm since a couple of years...
i use this lens for almost all my macros in my portfolio,
take a look, maybe it could be helpful for your choice;)
IMHO, it's a very good lens: fast, clear and very detailed.
right on these days, my birthday it's approaching, and i'm seriously thinking to buy a set of extension tubes from Kenko, to increase the magnification
Consider also the MP-E 65 2.8 macro,the price, it's almost double of the 100mm, but it's a killer lens, pretty difficult to manage with the focus, but worth a look!
I hope this could help u;)
Ciao
Davide

Mary Sue Hayward

(K=17558) - Comment Date 4/25/2006

I also love my 100mm macro. I use it a lot, plus from time to time I use an extension tube to boost it a bit. I know nothing about the other lens.

Good luck making your decision.

Stephen Bowden (K=64141) - Comment Date 4/25/2006

For future proofing Nathan I would definitely go with the Canon 100mm, the extra reach will come in handy for that elusive butterfly that you just cannot get too close to :-)

I would also consider the alternatives from Sigma and Tamron.

I have the Tamron 180mm F3.5 and in a recent review by Amateur Photographer it topped the Sigma and even the Canon offerings in regard to image quality !

Best wishes,
Steve

Le Yip (K=13) - Comment Date 5/1/2006

Go for the 100mm it's a great lens.

Kambiz K

(K=37420) - Comment Date 5/12/2006

If I were you I go for 100mm EF macro without any hesitation.

Tony Tiger (K=239) - Comment Date 5/21/2006

The only thing the 100 macro lacks is an L designation.

James McGinnis (K=6045) - Comment Date 6/2/2006

shot with the 100mm 2.8 macro about 30 minutes after it came in the mail!!

http://www.usefilm.com/Image.asp?ID=557337

Log in to post a response to this question

Return To Photography Forum Index

Elapsed Time:: 0.140625

Your photo sharing community!