Photograph By Marcus Armani
Marcus A.
Photograph By Marian Man
Marian M.
Photograph By a. Scarabeo
a. S.
Photograph By Rohan Sachdeva
Rohan S.
Photograph By Jan Symank
Jan S.
Photograph By Mike O'Brien
Mike O.
Photograph By Rob Graziano
Rob G.
Photograph By Roberto Arcari Farinetti
Roberto A.
 
imageopolis Home Sign Up Now! | Log In | Help  

Your photo sharing community!

Your Photo Art Is Not Just A Fleeting Moment In Social Media
imageopolis is dedicated to the art and craft of photography!

Upload
your photos.  Award recipients are chosen daily.


Editors Choice Award  Staff Choice Award  Featured Photo Award   Featured Critique Award  Featured Donor Award  Best in Project Award  Featured Photographer Award  Photojournalism Award

Imageopolis Photo Gallery Store
Click above to buy imageopolis
art for your home or office
.
 
  Find a Photographer. Enter name here.
    
Share On
Follow Us on facebook 

 



  Photography Forum: Medium Format Photography Forum: 
  Q. epson f3200 scanner for medium format

Asked by graham bell    (K=0) on 8/27/2005 
i have a large stock of 6x7 transparencies to be scanned and my old flatbed scanner isn't up to the job (very slow scanning) I have been looking at various scanners and am interested in the epson f3200 scanner (which is within my limited budget) and wondered if anyone has any experience of this scanner?

in the reviews i have read the scanning speed is supposed to be very good but i wondered what experience other have had in the real world. How long do scans take when scanning to 2400 dpi appox 70mb file size for 6x7 transparencies whilst using the dust removal software? (i will be scanning directly to ps7) and is the dust removal software any good? various reviews seem to be divided as to how good the software is.


    


Roger Williams
 Roger Williams  Donor  (K=86139) - Comment Date 8/27/2005
Hi, Graham, I have this scanner, and I am delighted with it. I got it for the negatives from my 120-film rotary camera, which takes 6 x 9 and 6 x 18cm negs for 180- and 360-degree panoramas. The camera is so heavy that I haven't been using it much recently, but I remember thinking "that's FAST" when I did my first scans a few months ago. Can't give you actual times, though. On 35mm scans the F3200 is very fast. It is also a "true" 3,200dpi scanner, as far as I can tell, unlike my previous Epson flatbed, which claimed 2,400 but never produced images that looked sharper than 1,200dpi. It just took longer and produced bigger files at that setting.

Couple of things you'll have to watch. One purpose of this scanner is to allow people who don't want to mess with computers to print directly from the scanner, and frankly, the software REALLY gets in the way if you don't want to do that. (I don't.) And of course you have to pay for all that anyway, which must have inflated the price a bit.

I think the dust-removal function must be tied in with the auto-print software and features, as I have to do quite a bit of spotting to remove dust on the negs I scan using the entirely manual approach.

But maybe if I read the manual I could track down the dust removal software... I haven't had it all that long, and although I read Japanese (I earn my living as a translator) it's a pain to have to try to decode the manual. Fortunately, if you know scanners at all it's VERY easy to operate and pretty intuitive.

Hope this helps. PLease ask anything else you'd like to know. I have a 6 x 6 SLR coming, and hope to get even more usage out of my scanner once it's arrived.




Log in to post a response to this question

 

 

Return To Photography Forum Index
|  FAQ  |  Terms of Service  |  Donate  |  Site Map  |  Contact Us  |  Advertise  |

Copyright ©2013 Absolute Internet, Inc - All Rights Reserved

Elapsed Time:: 0.125