Photograph By Art McCaffrey
Art M.
Photograph By a. Scarabeo
a. S.
Photograph By D M
D M.
Photograph By Radovan Magdalenic
Radovan M.
Photograph By Mike O'Brien
Mike O.
Photograph By The Pilgrim
The P.
Photograph By Serge Moscow
Serge M.
Photograph By a. Scarabeo
a. S.
 
imageopolis Home Sign Up Now! | Log In | Help  

Your photo sharing community!

Your Photo Art Is Not Just A Fleeting Moment In Social Media
imageopolis is dedicated to the art and craft of photography!

Upload
your photos.  Award recipients are chosen daily.


Editors Choice Award  Staff Choice Award  Featured Photo Award   Featured Critique Award  Featured Donor Award  Best in Project Award  Featured Photographer Award  Photojournalism Award

Imageopolis Photo Gallery Store
Click above to buy imageopolis
art for your home or office
.
 
  Find a Photographer. Enter name here.
    
Share On
Follow Us on facebook 

 



  Photography Forum: Photography Help Forum: 
  Q. C41 film
Howie Mudge
Asked by Howie Mudge    (K=27933) on 7/1/2006 
Hey all,

Im currently using Kodak Tri-X film for my black and white work but unfortunatley I have no way of being able to develop these films myself. I'm now looking into purchasing some C41 film so I can take it to a local Jessops to get developed there rather than send my film away and wait up to 10 days for the negatives to come back.

As I know nothing about C41 film, I was wondering if anyone could recommend any to me. Ideally, I would like a contrasty grainy type if it exists. Any recommendations are greatly welcome.

Thanks

Howie


    



 ann clancy   (K=2014) - Comment Date 7/1/2006
are you doing your own printing?

If so, you might try ilford's xp2 as it doesn't have a masking feature and is easy to print.

Easier, meaning times and contrast.

Kodak's c41 films have an orange maske, with increase expsoure issues in the darkroom and contrast issues as well.




José Azevedo
 José Azevedo   (K=9845) - Comment Date 7/16/2006
Hi,

a grainy C41 B&W film will be hard to find as they don't use silver grains but dyes. I've been using Kodak's BW400CN and find it has a very nice tonal and dinamic range and nice contrast, although it might tend to be on the low side sometimes. BUT if you do your own printing, this can be solved by changing the paper's contrast/filter. Should you, like me, scan your negatives and do your own "digital darkroom" work, this can be easily adjusted to your tastings in Photoshop.

Here's an image shot with it:

http://www.usefilm.com/Image.asp?ID=758152

I've used Ilford XP2 a long time ago (10 + years) and enjoyed it, it had more contrast than Kodak's BW400CN. But I think I've used its first generation, can precise how it is now. Here's a link to an image shot with it.

http://www.usefilm.com/Image.asp?ID=443404

Both have the characteristics of dye negative film:

- Almost no grain

- Very good dynamic range

- Can be pushed easily with great results (esperience with this and you may take some "grain" of them)

- Sharp

- Scans nicely, at least on my Nikon Coolscan III with Nikon's software. And you can use I.C.E., which is not available with silver films.

My suggestion is that you buy a roll of each and explore their limits (vary over and sub exposure) to find which suits more your taste.

Regards,

José Azevedo




Log in to post a response to this question

 

 

Return To Photography Forum Index
|  FAQ  |  Terms of Service  |  Donate  |  Site Map  |  Contact Us  |  Advertise  |

Copyright ©2013 Absolute Internet, Inc - All Rights Reserved

Elapsed Time:: 0.125