|
|
|
Daniel case
{K:756} 11/6/2003
|
I agree with steve. I have an elephant shot in my folder here at usefilm where I cropped around the facial features and it turned out ok. The small area is a little distracting but not a really big deal.
|
|
|
|
John Beavin
{K:4477} 10/10/2003
|
my dear fellow, a little tip for you get one of those tiny flashlights, a two aa battery one, glue a piece of plastic on it so that you can slide it into the hot shoe of your 602 and hey presto you have a nice catch light in that animals eye. Using your flash would be far to harsh. good luck
|
|
|
|
|
Alberto Agnoletti
{K:12811} 10/7/2003
|
E' proprio un bel "ritratto"!!
Ciao!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Becky V
{K:9699} 10/5/2003
|
Keeping in mind that I'm not an animal photographer, I'd say the photo isn't greatly harmed by the inclusion of the bg at the bottom, but it wouldn't hurt to eliminate it either. For myself, the focus of this piece is the eye. To see more detail in the eye (it's a little dark as is) would provide a lot of impact.
This is a good attempt, though. Most people always try to get in the whole animal. Way to use that zoom!
|
|
|
|
|
Steve Kaufman
{K:2748} 10/4/2003
|
Antonio, one of the joys of photography is creating an image that says something about your particular view of a subject. Photographing parts of animals rather than the entire animal can provide more intimate shots of the animal, showing one area close up. Until you look closely at an elephant's skin, ear, eye, or whatever, you don't really have a full appreciation for the entire animal. If I were to shoot this particular image, I would have attempted to crop it even more, to eliminate any background, and just have elephant parts in the image.
|
|
|
|
Orazio Minnella
{K:49417} 10/4/2003
|
Ottimo scatto ben definito con colori gradevoli.Saluti
|
|
0 
