|
Sarah Alshareef
{K:1010} 4/1/2007
|
hello Bruno, ur point of view is so true but the problem with this photo is that it was zoomed in so, that's why it looked that way!!
am trying to get a special lens to get the moon more clearly and sharpen...hope so!!
|
|
|
José Ninguém
{K:602} 4/1/2007
|
Very interesting idea, Sara! Perhaps a more sharp and less noisy shot would have helped a lot, though. My congratulations, nevertheless, for your creativity and beautiful abstract!
Best regards,
Bruno
|
|
|
Sarah Alshareef
{K:1010} 2/12/2007
|
hello again Mr...thank u soo much for stopping by to reply
and about the feminine touch>>>>that's true
by the way it wasn't a b&w>>>i shot the moon at night...that's all thank u
|
|
|
Albert Jacobs
{K:9527} 2/10/2007
|
Hi Sara,
Excellent abstract !
The tones are beautiful and the curves are quite feminine. Just interpretation, but that means already this is a great image. B&W was a perfect choice. Compliments !
Best wishes for you and yours, Albert Jacobs :)
|
|
|
Sarah Alshareef
{K:1010} 7/15/2006
|
Debprasad...thank u sooo much for the compliment...i really appreciate it wishing u all the best..
|
|
|
Sarah Alshareef
{K:1010} 7/15/2006
|
hello Jimmy, imagination + light are almost everything in photography thanx alot for ur lovely comment...
all za best..
|
|
|
Debprasad Datta
{K:1545} 7/15/2006
|
Even I've been experimenting with Moon Photography, but you have definitely made a landmark in the subject. Great Imagination!
|
|
|
Jimmy Perez
{K:1694} 7/15/2006
|
Sara this is a cool shot lets you use your imagination i like it. great job.
jimmy
|
|
|
James Cook
{K:38068} 7/6/2006
|
Here is my first foray into shooting the moon Luxagraphically:
http://www.usefilm.com/image.asp?id=1141235
|
|
|
James Cook
{K:38068} 6/28/2006
|
I now have plans to shoot the moon luxagraphically.
|
|
|
Sarah Alshareef
{K:1010} 6/28/2006
|
hello again James, u r sooo supportive :)..iam so grateful...thanx for all ur comments
try this idea ..and show it to me when u do..ok
bye
|
|
|
James Cook
{K:38068} 6/27/2006
|
Interesting. I haven't tried to use the moon in my Luxagraphic images yet. (I have done timed exposures of the moving clouds over the moon, but that's different.) Good idea.
|
|
|
Sarah Alshareef
{K:1010} 1/6/2006
|
first of all, thank u all for ur comments..even the critical way of some of u is somehow not good ...well, i posted this mysterious photo..just to let you people think of it...it's not POINLESS...ok....well, as i can see no one knew what it is...actaully it's the moon..but while shooting i was again..waving my hands..that's all... (if anyone came up with a very different, weired, funky way of taking photos..we don't call his photos POINTLESS)...thank u again 4 ur advices.bye
|
|
|
AJ Miller
{K:49168} 1/6/2006
|
Hi Sara! I think Paul and Wez have a point. I really don't understand this. Something written in "about" could perhaps help? John
|
|
|
Wez
{K:14339} 1/6/2006
|
Why would anyone post a noisy picture such as this without any explanation as to its intention or subject??
Maybe this poster thinks they are more 'artistic' than the rest and are happy to baffle them.
Without such info this image is pointless.
Regards
|
|
|
Paul Lara
{K:88111} 1/6/2006
|
Believe WHAT ...or not? An explanation or hint would be nice.
|
|