Photograph By Luis  Steinberg (EFIAP)
Luis  S.
Photograph By Ayan Mukherjee
Ayan M.
Photograph By Saeed Al Shamsi
Saeed A.
Photograph By dimitar bekyarov
dimitar b.
Photograph By Paul Harrett
Paul H.
Photograph By Riny Koopman
Riny K.
Photograph By a. Scarabeo
a. S.
Photograph By Jill Bartlett
Jill B.
 
imageopolis Home Sign Up Now! | Log In | Help  

Your photo sharing community!

Your Photo Art Is Not Just A Fleeting Moment In Social Media
imageopolis is dedicated to the art and craft of photography!

Upload
your photos.  Award recipients are chosen daily.


Editors Choice Award  Staff Choice Award  Featured Photo Award   Featured Critique Award  Featured Donor Award  Best in Project Award  Featured Photographer Award  Photojournalism Award

Imageopolis Photo Gallery Store
Click above to buy imageopolis
art for your home or office
.
 
  Find a Photographer. Enter name here.
    
Share On
Follow Us on facebook 

 

 
User Activity
Image Summary
Awards Received
Portfolio Summary
Critiques from Geoff
Critiques to Geoff

Portfolios

Categories
Cityscape (1)
Nature (2)


Critiques From Geoff Powers


  1


Critique By: Geoff Powers  (K:66)  
5/22/2003 11:02:20 AM

Hey Brian...

Nice, deep, classic 'piggy-back' effort. M 42 seems a little burned out, but the diffuser way have contributed to this. The dynamic range of this area of the night sky is a challenge for film. Here's a single exposure of the region with more focal length (135mm) and a Median Filter blur similar to the process you described in your previous post. For a larger version, go here:

http://home.att.net/~astropix/M42_135mm.html

... let me know when you add some others here at usefilm.com !!!

Geoff
        Photo By: Brian Larmay  (K:25)

Critique By: Geoff Powers  (K:66)  
5/21/2003 11:05:04 PM

Hey Taras...

Why not crop like this one... ???

Geoff
        Photo By: Taras R. Hnatyshyn  (K:4055)

Critique By: Geoff Powers  (K:66)  
5/21/2003 9:52:40 PM

Taras...

Lotsa problems with this one... under-exposed is the biggest problem. Ineffective focal length... wider field of view with some foreground would have yielded a better image. Focus seems soft... or you had some kind of vibration issue... or both. Image is *way* off center. My skies were clouded during this most recent Lunar Eclipse... but compare to my shot from the Jan. 2000 event. Keep shootin'... experience is the best teacher !!!

Geoff Powers
        Photo By: Taras R. Hnatyshyn  (K:4055)

Critique By: Geoff Powers  (K:66)  
5/21/2003 6:02:30 PM

Thanks all for the nice words and great rating! Taras... the procedure outlined above is the *only* way to achieve a double exposure with these camera bodies. As such... the precision of the alignment of the second exposure leaves much to be desired... you can't excercise complete control of the framing for the latter exposure. Combine this with the extended focal lengths being used... especially the 1000mm FL of the lunar shot, it's hit or miss - pure and simple.

Personally, the ghosting of the spire is what I *like* about this shot... when one takes the artistic approach over the analytical, there can be no mistakes... only happy accidents !!!

Geoff
        Photo By: Geoff Powers  (K:66)

Critique By: Geoff Powers  (K:66)  
5/21/2003 5:51:13 PM

HA writes:
> Im not gonna read that!

(Hee-Hee)... LOL... I didn't want to write it, either! The subject is Alternative Process... and since inquiring minds (may) want to know... I felt I should let the cat out of the bag on this one! HeH... if astro stuff was easy... everyone would do it! Thanks for the ratings!

GP
        Photo By: Geoff Powers  (K:66)

Critique By: Geoff Powers  (K:66)  
5/21/2003 5:44:29 PM

I love the twilight stuff... color saturation here was pushed *almost* to the breaking point... but it (barely) maintains... good job.

Geoff Powers
        Photo By: Lucas Macedo  (K:12843)


  1


|  FAQ  |  Terms of Service  |  Donate  |  Site Map  |  Contact Us  |  Advertise  |

Copyright ©2013 Absolute Internet, Inc - All Rights Reserved

Elapsed Time:: 0.1367188