|
|
Tim Schumm
{K:29196} 4/2/2005
|
love your pano images Roger. this composition is just great!
|
|
|
|
Mary Brown
{K:71879} 3/31/2005
|
A beautiful picture, Roger. I love the panorama and the shadows. This one, also s like an invitation to walk through the park. That may be a wierd way to describe a picture. However, it definately is a compliment to your skill in presenting the scene realistically and beautifully.
Thank you so very much for your kind comment on my Moon pictures. The Moon is very telescope friendly. I am please with how these turned out. Many did not as holding the camera in the exact right place and holding it steady, well... There are times that being stubborn is of benefit.
Mary
-
|
|
|
|
Roger Williams
{K:86139} 3/26/2005
|
Thanks Rob. I use an Epson flatbed with nominal 2,400dpi resolution. But rather than try to use that, which I think is overstated, I select 300dpi for the size of the output print I want, usually on a 10cm width roll of Epson PM photo grade (which ends up about 26cm long with these negatives). That converts to about 1,200dpi.
|
|
|
|
|
Keith Naylor
{K:13064} 3/25/2005
|
Hi Roger,
I almost bought a widelux a few weeks ago, but the lure of a big white lens was too much.
I really do like these panoramas, and now with the colour enhancement I think you have a tremendous image here, one I would be proud to have in my collection.
Good work, and Happy Easter
Keith
|
|
|
|
Rob Ernsting
{K:8899} 3/25/2005
|
Very nice panorama with an inmense wideness and lovely depth. The shadows of the trees over the full height is splendid. Excellent work Roger. Question which scanner do you use to convert to digital? Have agood Easter, Rob.
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Spracklen
{K:32552} 3/25/2005
|
Very nice shot, Roger. This one could have been taken right here in England!
Best regards, Chris
|
|
0 
