|
|
Mary Vareli
{K:15826} 1/2/2005
|
It is nice for me to know that some people understand me...tha art I create is conceptual, goes beyond photographs each image has a topic explored.
thank you, you make feel nice!
|
|
|
|
G G
{K:61359} 1/2/2005
|
All the power between the title and the picture!! I like you work and your feeling Mary. Excellent
|
|
|
|
Saeed Al Shamsi
{K:47735} 11/3/2004
|
I like your arrangement, that perfect light which an artistic look, brilliant composition presentation, Saeed
|
|
|
|
|
Mary Vareli
{K:15826} 11/3/2004
|
Oh now I understand!! So your photo is symbolic!! I like it!!
|
|
|
|
Marian Man
{K:80636} 11/3/2004
|
..touches me deeply.... so I'll put it in my favorites....Marian
|
|
|
|
drilan P drilan
{K:12030} 11/3/2004
|
Eh bien! moi j'aime bien celle-ci et la suivante, sans savoir laquelle je préfère ; puis-je demander pourquoi vous précisez que c'est intentionnellement surex? Les gens n'ont pas à douter de votre professionalisme, ni vous à douter de leur jugement.
This part of the text was about your photo...
and the other part (cut off here) was about mine. drilan
|
|
|
|
|
Mary Vareli
{K:15826} 11/3/2004
|
Cher Drilan, si vous vérifiez l'image précédente (le premier ange) vous comprendra pourquoi je signale des anges ! Aucun il n'a rien à faire avec les morts ! ! Merci du commentaire !
|
|
|
|
|
drilan P drilan
{K:12030} 11/3/2004
|
Eh bien! moi j'aime bien celle-ci et la suivante, sans savoir laquelle je préfère ; puis-je demander pourquoi vous précisez que c'est intentionnellement surex? Les gens n'ont pas à douter de votre professionalisme, ni vous à douter de leur jugement.
Merci, même si c'est weird (mystérieux, surnaturel ou étrange, bizarre? les deux peut-être, mais vous savez que le 2 nov. c'est le jour des morts)
drilan
|
|
|
|
|
Mary Vareli
{K:15826} 11/2/2004
|
This image has what Mr Antoniadis (TEI of photography)call "an indication" in photography, that is some lines that testify that a real image was decpicted, in a partial way, it is abstract. Thanx for commentin dear. I find it natural for someone not to like something.
|
|
|
|
|
Patrick Jacobson
{K:29151} 11/2/2004
|
Very moody and dark! =) Great feeling it gives.. i like it.. =)
Cheers
Patrick j
|
|
|
|
|
Marcus Claésson
{K:2179} 11/2/2004
|
Like the expression and how you have composed everything. The picture is a bit abstract and that make it interesting. Well done!
/Marcus
|
|
|
|
|
Petros Stamatakos
{K:12101} 11/2/2004
|
Kosta, you are not going crazy. The image is underexposed. I'm not sure what Mary is trying to say. But damn it, I will not have definitions re-defined by Mary!!! hehehe (joking Mary)
Mary, this image unlike your others, fails to convey to me, anything more than that this is an image simply gone wrong. Sorry.
|
|
|
|
|
Maria Luisa Vial
{K:36017} 11/2/2004
|
Beautiful picture Mary... Love the lighting... Excellent composition...
Cheers,
MaLuisa
|
|
|
|
Kostas Tzanetos
{K:22012} 11/1/2004
|
Mary Mary Mary... i know well what the darkroomies call under- and over-exposure, but i also know that a slide is NOT a negative so if it gets less light than needed then it simply comes out dark! ;-)
good night :-)
|
|
|
|
Gabriella Carta
{K:22879} 11/1/2004
|
wonderful job, good! Regards by Gabry
|
|
|
|
|
Maria José Barres
{K:11276} 11/1/2004
|
Dramatic shot! Good work.
|
|
|
|
|
Mary Vareli
{K:15826} 11/1/2004
|
Kosta when a negative gets less light than it should then it is whitish (underexposed), when it gets more light than it needs it is darker(overexposed). I guess you have experience in a dark room to know how to "read" negatives. See you!!
|
|
|
|
|
Kostas Tzanetos
{K:22012} 11/1/2004
|
hmm,not only my eyesight is still adequate and my monitor a good one but i've also met you a couple of times in person so as not to mistake this statue for your face,miss Vareli...i just made an unsuccessful joke,that's all :-P
as for the appearance of your shot,it looks to me that it has received LESS light than needed,and in my book this is called underexposure ;-)
be happy inside, dear fairy creature :-)
kostas
|
|
|
|
|
David Bircham
{K:1300} 11/1/2004
|
Excellent Mary! I find this image very intriguing. I like what little is there. The blues, bronze, and blacks work well together. :) db
|
|
|
|
|
B:)liana
{K:30945} 11/1/2004
|
I just love it dear Mary. well find and seen and presented. superb!
Thank you dear Friend for having found me!
Kisses, Biliana
|
|
|
|
Jeanette Hägglund
{K:59855} 11/1/2004
|
Excellent and interesting about.
Jeanette
|
|
|
|
|
Michele Berti
{K:14921} 11/1/2004
|
Very nice! Great mood here.
|
|
|
|
|
Mary Vareli
{K:15826} 11/1/2004
|
En fotografía el uso de una "indicación" revela a veces la identidad de una imagen. Es oscuro porque overexposed! Gracias mi amigo!
|
|
|
|
Ian McIntosh
{K:42997} 11/1/2004
|
Silk textures in the blurr and in the focus.
|
|
|
|
|
Mary Vareli
{K:15826} 11/1/2004
|
It is not me Kostas, can't you see it is a statue? Definitely NOT underexposed, quite the opposite I daresay!
|
|
|
|
|
Roberto Carli
{K:13689} 11/1/2004
|
I like this one,very good crop,congrats!!
|
|
|
|
|
APPAVE José
{K:566} 11/1/2004
|
Great shot and composition. Take care. JA
|
|
|
|
|
Kostas Tzanetos
{K:22012} 11/1/2004
|
which of the two makes your skin look so artificial,Mary? forgetting or remembering?
or is it just film underexposure? :-)
|
|
|
|
Gustavo Scheverin
{K:164501} 11/1/2004
|
La verdad es dificil entenderla....
Creo que esta demasiado oscura---
|
|
0 
