|
Rawabi Al-Nuaimi
{K:15659} 8/25/2004
|
beautiful shot.. very cute deer and beautiful effect :)
|
|
|
Paul Lara
{K:88111} 8/24/2004
|
Good call, Don. Actually, the original image DOES have more contrast, but in my attempt to add texture, the process reduced it.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a47e7/a47e7554e951ce5cb20e3e2bcb372ffd7224dc4d" alt="" Here's the original |
|
|
Don Loseke
{K:32503} 8/23/2004
|
It could use just a bit more contrast. Excellent capture. Don.
|
|
|
Trish McCoy
{K:15897} 8/23/2004
|
excellent capture
|
|
|
Ernie Basciano
{K:1940} 8/23/2004
|
I am not very fond of the texture, I think if you are going to do somethign like that you need to make it more obvious. I am sorry, but I also find it hard to look at an animal with no legs.
Either a tighter shot isolating the head and neck, or a farther away full body shot would be nicer. IMHO of course.
|
|
|
Rebecca Raybon
{K:26654} 8/23/2004
|
Nice, clear shot. The texture doesn't hurt this image any.
|
|
|
Tony Diana
{K:13396} 8/23/2004
|
Una textura de lienzo curiosa
|
|
|
Paul Lara
{K:88111} 8/23/2004
|
Well, you can clearly deduce all that from the warning symbols that Mama Nature has sprinkled upon this beast. Also note the 300mm lens setting, as I dared not get too close without some cheeze or other distraction.
|
|
|
Jim Loy
{K:31373} 8/23/2004
|
Careful city boy... those things bite. They have huge fangs... and are poisonous. I know about these things. JIL
|
|
|
Jeff Fiore
{K:11277} 8/22/2004
|
Nice capture. Not sure about the texture although it seems to work.
|
|