|
mohamed gohar
{K:144} 11/24/2004
|
very nice pic, actually i like most of your work but this one stands out good work
|
|
|
Shahenaz Fouad
{K:453} 10/10/2004
|
I understand what you mean. I'll think of it next time. Thanks for your advice.
|
|
|
Monir El.Shazly
{K:2218} 10/6/2004
|
less depth o field means the background ould be a lot less visible. the easiest way to do it is by using a small range lens, or by having a bigger Aparture, or standing closer to the subject. i you need more help email me at monir12@yahoo.com
|
|
|
Shahenaz Fouad
{K:453} 10/6/2004
|
Hi Monir, Sorry to ask, but what do you mean by less depth of field? I like this photo, but I feel it could be much better.
|
|
|
Monir El.Shazly
{K:2218} 10/5/2004
|
with a lot less depth of field, this photo ould have been an excellent one.
nice capture though
|
|
|
Shahenaz Fouad
{K:453} 7/25/2004
|
Thanks, Yes it is in sepia mode. Maybe the singer could have been a little lighter?
|
|
|
Ozjan Yeshar
{K:15239} 7/23/2004
|
Superb mood! Is it sepia mood? It is a very fascinating emotional outcome you have handled in this shot. Cheers & BIG 7.
|
|