|
Roger Williams
{K:86139} 3/19/2004
|
Alan, you're quite right about the film. It was 800. Sorry about that--I've corrected the error now. And the lens is that wonderful Heliar, quite exceptional... the only thing that keeps me shooting at 50mm focal lengths!
|
|
|
Alan Mead
{K:2020} 3/18/2004
|
This is the portrait that I always admired: the exposure is so good and colours really natural. I thought you had used 800 ISO but I see that 400 is specified. The sharp lens is also a feauere that I liked, it seems true to say that lenses have their own personality. Certainly, this one has such. Alan M.
|
|
|
Roger Williams
{K:86139} 3/5/2004
|
Chris--thanks! Much better...
|
|
|
Chris Spracklen
{K:32552} 3/5/2004
|
I think I'd have been tempted to crop this one a little Roger, as below? It just cuts out a little of the clutter. Kind regards, Chris
|

|
|
|
Murat Tanriover
{K:8387} 3/5/2004
|
I got hungry now. Good shot...
|
|
|
Roger Cotgreave
{K:15892} 3/5/2004
|
you are right it is busy but most of your shots are and in some way it tells more of a story but maybe not a striking portrait. Maybe you should try some close ups, this has a lovely light..rog
|
|
|
Craig Garland
{K:27077} 3/5/2004
|
Hi Roger; I like all the little details-- tells something about the people's lives. I might clone out that bit of picture frame, but of course a "prist" wouldn't do that. Thanks for your comments and ratings on my-- mostly seascapes lately. I'm mostly an outdoor nature photographer but love good abstracts whether in nature or man-made stuff. But I also like and and appreciate many types of photography. Cheers. Craig
|
|
|
Antonella Nistri
{K:21867} 3/5/2004
|
In my opinion it's a great shot,Roger! Congrats,Antonella
|
|
|
Rob Ernsting
{K:8899} 3/5/2004
|
Very much like a preparation for Christmass with all the goodies scattered around. Lovely picture and technically very well managed. Regards, Rob.
|
|