|
|
|
MaryBell
{K:32791} 12/18/2003
|
I looked at the high contrast one - I like this one better...
|
|
|
|
|
MaryBell
{K:32791} 12/18/2003
|
I think the contrast is good here - the temptation to go darker would probably ruin the fragility of this shot...
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Grace-Martin
{K:10183} 12/16/2003
|
I like the one with more contrast better. The other one looks pretty "muddy" on my monitor. Quite nice!..:)
|
|
|
|
|
umut& umut
{K:18} 12/16/2003
|
good lęght and good composed. Thenks...What Think About my pictures ?
|
|
|
|
|
Vladimir Efimochkin
{K:73} 12/16/2003
|
Very lovely portrait! Good soft light.
|
|
|
|
|
Joao Brosque
{K:4197} 12/16/2003
|
Excellent B&W photo.
Congratulations...
Joao
|
|
|
|
Pat Fruen
{K:12076} 12/16/2003
|
Hey, Natalie. I agree with you about the contrast...I can't decide if it needs more or not, but here is a version with it increased. Thanks for your thoughts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
kita mcintosh
{K:18594} 12/16/2003
|
lovelyyyyyyyyyyysoft skin
|
|
|
|
|
Natalie Papadopoulos
{K:5247} 12/16/2003
|
Hi again Pat. She's beautiful - it's a really tender expression and so sweet. I love your perspective too. I feel like it needs more contrast.. but I'm not sure if it actually does. : )
|
|
|
|
Randy Lorance
{K:24769} 12/16/2003
|
Really nice tone and composition this portrait.
|
|
|
|
c c
{K:13449} 12/16/2003
|
Beautiful! Much improved. The contrasts are perfect and the tones are wonderful! Great work. I softened my picture of Jack based on your comments--take a look when you have a chance. Charisse
|
|
0 
