|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 11/14/2009
|
Exactly Scully! ;-)
And the guys from the photo labor discovered that their process for this film type had to be re-callibrated in order to get the micro-fiber dryer rotating in the right angle/direction in reference to the film frames. They told me that it is way not the same if it rotates at the one or the other angle. I couldn't even imagine that but I will try another one and see what happens then.
It seems you were indeed on the right path!
Mulder. ;-)
|
|
|
|
Andre Denis
{K:66327} 11/12/2009
|
It will be interesting to see what it turns out to be, As Dana Scully from the X-Files used to say.."There must be a reasonable explanation for this phenomenum" :)
Andre
|
|
|
|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 11/7/2009
|
Hi Andre!
And when I think of it... you must be bingo here! This can really be the reason for that!
So now I have at last some clue about what I could ask my trustworthy Mr Byland from the local photo stoe. I showed him the images and he already informed his partners who developed this fild. (As I already said that was not a film that he could develop with his equipment in the shop.) They said that they can't imagine any problem in their processing lines, but now we can perhaps give them a clue in order to be aware of potential problems.
Andre, I thank you so much for the help!
Nick
|
|
|
|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 11/7/2009
|
Many thanks again, Dave!
If I only knew about those lines...
Nick
|
|
|
|
|
Andre Denis
{K:66327} 11/6/2009
|
Hi Nick,
I would almost bet that the marks are the result of residue left behind by the drying process. There is probably something like a hi-teck wind shield wiper "squeegee" that is brushed over the film in an effort to stop water marks from forming. It might not be working at 100% efficiency.
I remember having similar problems with calcium like deposits when developing my own B&W film.
Andre
|
|
|
|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 11/6/2009
|
Thanks a lot for the input, Wayne. I also tip to my scanning process but still I didn't find anything certain. It has to be examined in all detail, I guess...
Cheers!
Nick
|
|
|
|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 11/5/2009
|
Hi Andre!
You are absolutely right. It was the same roll of film and all the images were developed by the same external partner of my photo store.
I am examining the films and my scanning process. It seems that the marks are really on the developed film frames... Strange but I try to get some reasonable understanding of that.
Nick
|
|
|
|
Dave Stacey
{K:150877} 11/4/2009
|
A nicely composed architectural, as well as street shot, Nick!
Dave.
|
|
|
|
Nanda Baba das
{K:78053} 11/3/2009
|
I agree with Andre. People in the picture have strong red color.
Best wishes
Nanda
|
|
|
|
Wayne Harridge
{K:18292} 11/3/2009
|
Definitely take a look at the velvia with a magnifier, but I have the feeling the lines might be a scanning articat of some kind. Strange that they are at an angle and not parallel to the frame edges.
...Wayne
|
|
|
|
|
Andre Denis
{K:66327} 11/2/2009
|
Hi Nick,
I'm going to assume that the four posted today are from the same roll of film, and developed at the same time. I could be wrong, but it seems they have similar developing parameters.
I think the lines are probably on the negatives due to a problem with the film processing. Check the negatives under some kind of magnification.
Andre
|
|
0 
