I have to thank you again for your high spirit,and understanding. I agree with you hundred per cent,and it is UF that taught me half of what I know now,and I am still in the process of learning the other half,my regards, Saad.
It is from constructive comments like yours that I learn. When working with an image in high contrast post processing, sometimes it just comes down to how much time do want to spend on it. I prefer to select better compositional subjects over technical perfection. If an image gathers enough interest I can always go back and put in the time to make it better technically. One of the reasons to post here is to learn, not just post only the highest quality ones for praise, right?
Hi dear,thank you very much for accepting my rather hard input which I post it with high moral intention,it is exactly the technical approach that I meant,and not by itself alone,I have compare this shot technically with your other posts of the same day,and find it at the end of the list,and I completely agree with the concept of the shot,my very best, Saad.
I respect your view Saad, as a image it is rather poor technically. Primarily from that she was in a heavy shade area and was tough to get an image of it. But the content was strong enough to try and give it as much life as I could. She is pulling their luggage and carrying a pet (cat carrier?) box on Hollywood Blvd. The body language shows a tired worn out person who has some beauty. She obviously has seen better days. Maybe just thrown of her apartment? Plus the circles in the fence are symbolic of wheels turning, moving on. My feeling was that this person had great dreams when she first came here and now they have been broken. Maybe I will revisit the image and see if I could clean it up an little.
allow me to say Robert,this is a below average photo,you cant compare it few pixels of the (street of dreams),I feel something wrong is going here,my best regards, Saad.
0 
