in deed Nick, it is light and the form it shapes, that in its posture presents a conventional perception of the form but, then- leaps onto something, as you call new category! yet, trying to be faithful and never negate the presence of a strong relation of elements within the canvas,
your wishes are granted Nick, and i have to thank you a lot for the promotion!
As already said... just go for an investigation of your family tree, Visar! I can't imagine that Dali's line lies so far away from yours, ey?
Because, just take a look at this one! Well, what it "really" is gets simply burried under the prominence, the unbelievable poer of light itself, which then also receives its natural freedom to do as it wishes! Of course I do "see" eyes, and "hats", and "outfits", or even some "modelled" dancer in the narrow realm of a hypothetical spotlight that ripped the darkness in two for just hitting its "mate".
But the important thing in your new steps in photography, forme, is that you don't define. You don't enslave your subject. You just expose, still you get interesting and strongly suggestive compositions of pure light in motion, and then... Whoa! You surprise! Yes! Because you don't even ask questions the way the naive fans of symbolics always do. No, you even allow the questions to be formed in the minds of the spectators, as free of any "guidance" as it can get!
The contrast is strong, the colors too, the indefinitness of the subject too, and then I search for the message.. and you say that it is in my own mind and not really on the image. Which of course is the only sincere and direct way to go for this kind of photography! Completely outside any, really *any* of the usual categories!
0 
![\](http://thumbs.imageopolis.com/images/5/3/5/2/5352/1370264-Micro.jpg "\")
{K:127263} 8/5/2008
