A general comment, yes, but one that both encourages me to keep up and also gives me much to think about. Of course it's something very good to have the own recognizable style, which I think is one of the most important things for everybody, and not only in photography. The thing is that I don't really find myself trying to somehow get to some particular style, or if I do then I do that some way unconsciously. It's only just "following" the available scenes out there and most of the time I have really difficulties to follow, since they evolve faster than I can see ;-)
But I feel quite comfortable with this situation on the streets and perhaps this at the end brings also some kind of "recognizable results" as images. It must be something like that. I gradually came to the impression that the less I interfere with the natural evolution of the scene itself, the more authentic the scene looks on the image. Which, if true, of course would mean that at the end the photographer has to become negligible as a potential factor that affects the result of the shot - and that's the problem: To shot a photo just as if there had been no photographer and no camera around ;-)
And why do I write all this if I am to become negligible? Hard question! ;-)
Greetings, Nick! There's a general comment I'd like to pass on to you this time, and that is that you have a particular style that is immediately recognisable. Didn't need the name underneath to know this was your's... And that in itself shows a particular skill and maturity.
0 
