|
|
Lana M
{K:811} 3/21/2007
|
Thanks for the advice. At this time i am working on getting the best shot I can in the camera. I do not have editing software but I have seen that done before and t definitely creates an interesting and almost 3-D look.
|
|
|
|
Joe Johnson
{K:8529} 3/21/2007
|
Have you considered either or both using double exposures to increase range or focus field? Here, with a tripod, at your preferred f/, you could have manually focused near, and then shot another far, and blended in software, if you have such that could allow a blending gradient. And in that way, position higher or lower, or at different points in that display, and execute the same to see if something is more appealing about one and not another, to your own mind.
|
|
|
|
Roberto Arcari Farinetti
{K:209486} 3/20/2007
|
powerful image on rock.. well done lana!
roby
|
|
|
|
Marian Man
{K:80636} 3/20/2007
|
I see what you mean dear Lana!!! great capture!!!! fine title too!!!
all the best
Marian
|
|
|
|
|
Lana M
{K:811} 3/19/2007
|
Its manmade - I cant remember exactly what part of town I was in.
|
|
|
|
Dave Arnold
{K:55680} 3/17/2007
|
Very unusual formations, Lana. It sure looks like a city of skyscrapers. What part of Flagstaff is this? Living rather near there (in NM), I've wanted to do some exploring of various northern AZ
You might consider hitting this with a little bit of unsharp mask. Really does wonders for a digital photo.
Best wishes,
Dave
|
|
|
|
|
E A
{K:33} 3/13/2007
|
Great title for the picture - it really does look like a city. Good eye.
|
|
|
|
|
Lana M
{K:811} 3/13/2007
|
When I go back to the area I'll see what I can do.
|
|
|
|
Jim Budrakey
{K:24393} 3/10/2007
|
Very interesting shot but I wish there was something to give me a clue to the scale.
|
|
|
|
|
Luciano Guimarães
{K:691} 3/10/2007
|
Hi Lana, very good "eye" to figured out this image. Realy looks like a big city and its suburb.
All the best,
Luciano.
|
|
0 
