|
SaMiHa Jawad
{K:1447} 9/7/2009
|
Very nice excellent :)
|
|
|
Armen Haroutunyan
{K:4787} 4/28/2009
|
excellent capture
|
|
|
Melinda Martin
{K:698} 4/28/2009
|
This location is in one of my favorite photo wonderlands. The divesity of Death Valley is wonderful. Badwater give you the opportunity, which you have seized upon, to see beauty in desolation, color in what appears monochromatic to the untrained eye. Good depth, good color, excellent composition. I love it!
|
|
|
Vijay Kurhade
{K:10118} 4/28/2009
|
lovely shot; flower field, mountain, great take care
|
|
|
Mitra Nademi-Nassari
{K:28234} 9/17/2007
|
Very beautiful!
|
|
|
Austin Yapp
{K:508} 5/18/2006
|
awseome comp, love the picture
|
|
|
Hugo de Wolf
{K:185110} 5/8/2006
|
Hi Agnes,
Thanks for the feedback, it provides an entirely new insight, and, frankly, one I wish I would've thought of myself...:) My intentions with this series were far from that deep; the background idea behind this series was to capture the Death Valley desert scenes from a different PoV; the perspective in the title refering to the primary subject being something different from what people usually capture, looking for strong diagonal interaction with the more common subject: the landscape itself.
I do like your thoughts, though. To me, any insight is as valuable, regardless of the photographic experience; usually, I spent a lot of thought behind my photos, and that's why I post them in series of three, sharing a common theme or element. If I manage to allow people to create their own views, I feel happy, as happy as when people perceive the image the same way as I do. I hope you understand what I mean. (as in I hope I explained myself properly...)
Thanks, I really appreciate your comment, it's great to see a photo through someone elses' eyes!
Cheers,
Hugo
|
|
|
Agnes Lemley
{K:427} 5/8/2006
|
I think, after reading many critiques of these three works, and studying them with what little insite I have into good photography, I understand what you mean by desert perspectives. You are looking at the surroundings as the desert itself might see them from a sand level viewpoint. It's a great series laughing at man and his attempts to make the desert itself different. Hoping I am getting this and not just having a pipe dream! Best regards, Agnes
|
|
|
Hugo de Wolf
{K:185110} 5/8/2006
|
Hi Petal, Thanks for your feedback! As you probably know, I'm not too fond of shooting flowers, as I'm no good at it, but I liked the contrast in tones, and the mere sight of flowers in the desert in this scene, and tried to combine the two, keeping in mind the similarities with the other two and idea behind this series...
Cheers,
hugo
|
|
|
Hugo de Wolf
{K:185110} 5/8/2006
|
Hi Randy, thankd for y7our comment and feedback. I tried to achieve exactly what you described by protruding the flower into the sky, the contrast between the bright tones being one of the features, the contrast with the mountains on the right the other. Great to read it worked (in your opinion...:)
Cheers,
Hugo
|
|
|
Petal Wijnen
{K:50989} 5/8/2006
|
Hi there Hugo... am on a 'back in time trip'... and came across this grand view. Love it for the colors, the great depth/clarity of the shot and the wide angle view but mainly for the great composition: the flower in the left corner and then the gradual 'build up' of the mountains... Knowing me I probably would've taken just a close-up shot of that flower and missed out on a fantastic landscape shot... well captured!! Zo zie je maar: nachtdienst hebben heeft zo z'n voordelen, weer wat geleerd.. ;-D!!
|
|
|
Randy Lorance
{K:24769} 5/4/2006
|
Very well put together composition Hugo. The perspective gives good feel of the breadth of this formidable land. The contrasts between the flat plain and hills and the parched earth and delicate flowers, and the vibrant blue and yellow next to the flat gray and brown of the land forms a strong image. Good placement of the plant reaching up triumphantly before the open horizon to the left, which opens up the photograph to eye movement, whereas the hills streating entirely across the picture would leave it more static.
Randy
|
|
|
Meldijana Omerbegovic
{K:4079} 5/2/2006
|
So beautiful flowers in very interesting but unfriendly environment...very impressive strength of Life...beautiful colours and composition ..very nice image. Cheers Meldijana
|
|
|
Maurizio Massetti
{K:30463} 4/23/2006
|
I like tones and panorama, good cropping.
|
|
|
Dave Stacey
{K:150877} 4/16/2006
|
Amazing colours here, Hugo, and I like your low point of view, it's a great perspective! Thanks for your comment, too! Dave.
|
|
|
Brian Fillmore
{K:4016} 4/16/2006
|
Very nice perspective of this terrain so barren and yet dotted in bright coloured flowers
|
|
|
Mireille Heirendt
{K:7258} 4/10/2006
|
Hi Hugo, Now there is so much that has been said about this image and I tell you, I loved it right from the beginning and now after reading the comments, especially the negative ones ( including yours), I love it even more. The angle and of course the composition are awesome! I'm sure not many would have dared to make this choice and it works perfectly. What's more you did very well with the negative space in the foreground as it would have been too busy otherwise. In conclusion, this is such a powerful image in angle, composition, colors and patterns you should be very proud of !!! Best regards, Mireille
|
|
|
Muhammad Usman
{K:214} 4/10/2006
|
thats realy kool sir
|
|
|
Hugo de Wolf
{K:185110} 4/10/2006
|
Hi Omar,
Thanks for the feedback, Great to read your explanation and about what you see in it; thanks!
Cheers,
Hugo
|
|
|
Omar Rifaat
{K:10141} 4/9/2006
|
Hi hugo, not that this image has been under-commented, but my two cents worth: I like the angle and perspective because to me the flower says: 'why do you always look to the mountain, when I too am as majestic and beautiful in my defiance of drought and death... year after year, for as long as the mountain has stood, I too have burst forth..'
|
|
|
Jim Aho
{K:95} 4/9/2006
|
Beautifully composed, Hugo. Perfect exposure and execution as well. Nicely done as are so many of your images. Regards, Jim.
|
|
|
Hugo de Wolf
{K:185110} 4/8/2006
|
Hi David, thanks for your feedback, very insightful. I think what you described comes very close to what I had / have in mind with the collection of the three, yet to me, this is the least interesting one, primarily because of the subject... All purely subjective of course!
I've gone through my photos, and I have a few taken from a higher PoV, but the higher view point reduces the dominance of the primary subject, and as the density of the flowers was not that high, the yellow "haze" is also less aparent. but having said that, I deliberately shot from this low PoV to create this series, and I didn't put much effort in the photos taken from a higher PoV, I'm sure there's more potential in that scene than I managed to capture.
I really appreciate your thoughts, as it facilitates assessing this series myself!
Cheers,
Hugo
|
|
|
David Bourke
{K:2239} 4/6/2006
|
Well, I find this shot much more appealling that the fence picture. The first thing I find appealling is the subject. The flowers blanketing the desert floor, becoming a blur of yellow at the horizon is a truly worthy subject. The second thing I find appealling is the balance of the elements--principly the flowers and mountains and sky. I also think the lines of the picture, converging below the flower; they help to reinforce the balance.
Now I do think the phenomenom of the flowers blanketing the desert floor might be better shown from a higher point of view.
|
|
|
Mohamed Banna
{K:34237} 4/6/2006
|
still the NATURE is the MOTHER of INSPIRATION and always it gives us amazing vision great nature shot very artistic
|
|
|
Hugo de Wolf
{K:185110} 4/4/2006
|
Hi Ray, thanks for the feedback, I appreciate your views on the "negative space" in the foreground; I'm still struggling with that part a bit. There's still room for improvement, but I don't know in which direction.
Cheers,
Hugo
|
|
|
stingRay pt.4 .
{K:250401} 4/4/2006
|
Excellent shot Hugo with stunning colours and a wonderful perspective. I think the aforementioned 'negative' foreground space contains some great texture and increases the great depth to this landscape. Well shot sir. Best wishes to you....Ray
|
|
|
Hugo de Wolf
{K:185110} 4/4/2006
|
Hi Manu, about the alternative, some believe that that one is a "serious abuse to the Art of Photography"... So I'm afraid you didn't look at the alternative properly.. heheh.
Cheers,
Hugo
|
|
|
Hugo de Wolf
{K:185110} 4/4/2006
|
Hi Manu, Thanks; I understand exactly what you mean. Much appreciated; it pinpoints my thoughts exactly.
Cheers,
Hugo
|
|
|
Manu
{K:13082} 4/4/2006
|
Didn't see this one...I like this alternative version
Cheers mate
Manu
|
|
|
Manu
{K:13082} 4/3/2006
|
Excellent color and well composed but once you get past the pretty yellow and the low POV my eye starts to wander.....I did not mean for this comment to be as strong as it came out...but I think you at least understand me...eh, Hugo
Cheers mate
Manu
|
|
|
Hugo de Wolf
{K:185110} 4/3/2006
|
If you say so, Rashed, it must be true. I must be the worst excuse for a photographer, abusing the art of photography.
Great comment! It really makes my day. Very funny indeed!
Cheers,
Hugo
|
|
|
Rashed Abdulla
{K:163889} 4/3/2006
|
My great friend Hugo,
the attachment is very distractive and a serious abuse to the Art of Photography, there is nothing called “a new way to photograph a desert landscape”
What’s wrong is wrong and not you who should make it look good. I do not know how long you gonna maintain this attitude; I think people around here are more intelligent than to be fooled by any one.
I am really sorry my friend, as much as I like you, I feel there are many great photographers on UF both males and females. And they have very great images here but they never did post distractive images and insisted that their distractive images are of new techniques or new methods of photography.
I do wish you my entire the best great friend
|
|
|
Hugo de Wolf
{K:185110} 4/3/2006
|
Sorry, I forgot to attach the image, so here it is!
Cheers,
Hugo
|
Desert Perspectives II (Alternative) |
|
|
Hugo de Wolf
{K:185110} 4/3/2006
|
Dear Rashed, That's an interesting question, and an easy one to answer...
But first let me reassure you that I definitely do not consider myself one of the best photographers on UF, I just treat photography seriously, and say what I think to the best of my abilities. I try new things, to see if they work out or not, and I rarely post a photo on Usefilm which I'm completely satisfied about.
This series is all about an exaggerated difference between foreground and background and a new way to photograph a desert landscape (or more precise, capture elements within that desert, sketching the area and feel around it) I tried to achieve that by placing the primary subject extremely to one side, as well as using a low point of view to let the subject (the flower in this case) protrude the various levels, and deliberately seeking the contrast with the sky. It's not the easiest type of composition to look at, but I think it places things in a different perspective.
Where most people would photograph the landscape itself, I tried to use the landscape as a backdrop. In all three images, I think that turned out quite consistently.
The weak points about this photo: - The flower is too close to the left edge of the photo - Compared to the high saturation in the blue and yellow levels, the tones in the desert landscape are a bit weak (although they are better balanced in the original upload) - The flower is a bit out of focus, if that's due to a motion blur or a a bad choice for hyper-focal length, I'm not sure - This photo lacks a second (subsidiary) subject to complete the imaginary line towards the right of the image (the mountains) - There's too much empty space in the foreground - The cut off rock in the foreground next to the stem of the flower bugs me. - there's a tilt in the horizon which nobody (except for Teunis) has noticed.
The strong points of this image: + The wide angle distortion exaggerates the composition nicely in line with the two others + this photo fits well within the two others (although I do have an alternative option for you to consider, see attached) + I like the colours and the yellow haze created by the flowers to separate the field and the mountains in the background
As you see, I can find more weak points about my own photo as positive points, but to say that there's anything wrong with this photo is something quite different. In photography, which is subjective, there's no such thing as right or wrong, I believe. Everybody is entitled to their opinion, and they may like it or not, and I can only respect their opinion.
Hope this answers your question, and thanks for your comment, I really hope you understand what I'm saying...:)
Cheers,
Hugo
|
|
|
Rashed Abdulla
{K:163889} 4/3/2006
|
My dear friend Hugo, This time I will let you critique this image and not me. You please view this image and work out where should the eyes first look and focus on? When you achieve that you will find for sure what’s wrong with this image.
Yes I treat you different as you already considered yourself being one of the best photographers on UF and that’s itself makes you a subject for the serious critiques.
I like Hugo and I respect him, but I also love working out honestly on his images.
All of the best my dear friend Hugo
|
|
|
Joel Aron
{K:14920} 4/3/2006
|
I feel your pain. Was just printing all day for a friend, and had the same issue, and on a few had to bite the bullet, and say, 'okay, this is going to be one of those small images with a HUGE matte'.
good luck! curious to hear how it turns out!
cheers, -joel
|
|
|
Roberto Arcari Farinetti
{K:209486} 4/2/2006
|
to you too my dear hugo.. have all the best
cheers
roby
|
|
|
Ali Naghizadeh
{K:19600} 4/2/2006
|
Fantastic shot dear Hugo .. Well done .. Great Composition and brilliant DOF .. I love the contrast between the yellow of the flowers and the blue of the sky .. 7++
My very best wishes, aLi
|
|
|
Hugo de Wolf
{K:185110} 4/2/2006
|
Ah....:) The subject! Thanks, never considered that....:) Sounds weird, but as I rather prefer any fence above flowers, it explains a lot!
Cheers,
Hugo
|
|
|
Markus Scholz
{K:23722} 4/2/2006
|
Flowers beat fences, Hugo;-)
|
|
|
Hugo de Wolf
{K:185110} 4/2/2006
|
Hi Elisa, thanks for your comment. I agree, it's a nice change, to see life in the desert! If only for a few weeks a year...:)
Cheers,
Hugo
|
|
|
Hugo de Wolf
{K:185110} 4/2/2006
|
Hi Khaled, thanks for your comment. The 12-24mm is a great lens, definitely one of my favourites. Any idea how the Sigma compares to the Nikon?
Cheers,
Hugo
|
|
|
Hugo de Wolf
{K:185110} 4/2/2006
|
Dear Roby, thanks for your ever so kind comment. Always a pleasure to hear from you!
Cheers,
Hugo
|
|
|
Hugo de Wolf
{K:185110} 4/2/2006
|
Hi Nick, Thanks for your great critique, it's always very insightful to read what others see in a photo; it's like seeing it through someone else's eyes. Very insightful! Much appreciated!
Cheers,
Hugo
|
|
|
Hugo de Wolf
{K:185110} 4/2/2006
|
Hi Jeanette, Thanks for your elaborate feedback. Always great to see a photo through another ones' eye, very insightful!
The credit for the FC, of course, goes to Joggie, and has nothing to do with me, but can't say I don't appreciate it...;)
Cheers,
Hugo
|
|
|
Hugo de Wolf
{K:185110} 4/2/2006
|
Hi Markus, Thanks for your feedback, very interesting. I agree that the tones as well as the subject are rather different, but I would've thought the build-up of the composition is quite similar to the previous one (only mirrored) In that respect, I'm curious why the previous one received such a beating on the composition, whereas this one has received much more positive reactions. Any ideas?
Cheers,
Hugo
|
|
|
Hugo de Wolf
{K:185110} 4/2/2006
|
Hi John, nope, I've not encoutered that tiny cactus... And I'm rather glad I didn't by the sound of it...:) Thanks for your comment!
Cheers,
Hugo
|
|
|
Hugo de Wolf
{K:185110} 4/2/2006
|
Hi Joel, thanks for your feedback; I still have to make a print of this one, but I'm not sure it's quite sharp enough in the foreground; although it looks fine at this reduced size, the full size image looks a bit softer, probably because of the breeze, creating a small blur in the flower itself. I'll take the risk, though, I think...:)
Cheers,
Hugo
|
|
|
NN
{K:26787} 4/2/2006
|
Hi Hugo! What makes this tick for me is the strong yellow against the blue sky. Perfect angle/composition. It also provides hope; the desert isn´t completely deserted :)
|
|
|
Hugo de Wolf
{K:185110} 4/2/2006
|
Hi Lori, I somehow figured you'd like this one...:) Thanks!
Cheers,
Hugo
|
|
|
Hugo de Wolf
{K:185110} 4/2/2006
|
Hi Ron, thanks for the feedback; the way you describe the eye is led through the image is exactly what I had in mind. Good to hear it worked out as panned...:)
Cheers,
Hugo
|
|
|
Hugo de Wolf
{K:185110} 4/2/2006
|
Hi Don, Thanks for the feedback. And believe me, getting down this low is also quite a challenge for "us youngsters"....:) Just one question: Do you see the similarities between this photo and the previous one? and if so, how do you assess the change in composition? I think in build-up, these two are pretty similar, and I would really like to learn your views, as you weren't too positive about the previous one... I'd appreciate it!
Cheers,
Hugo
|
|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 4/1/2006
|
You'll find infinity in the infinitesimal - this is what comes into my mind looking at this picture. The chosen perpective makes the small thing to the center of intereset without lettingn the rest disappear. I think that this is a major plus here, together with the non-ending high detailedDOF and the deserted horizon, which leaves enough space for though and interpretation.
Very very nice!
|
|
|
Mary Slade
{K:40338} 4/1/2006
|
Stunning picture- the angle and strength of colours. To feature the yellow flowers from dry ground against the sky is wonderful Hugo.
|
|
|
joanna ewa
{K:8061} 3/31/2006
|
good colors, great composiotion congratulation because of front page:))
|
|
|
Thilo Bayer
{K:50358} 3/31/2006
|
Hi Hugo,
I admire the perspective here a lot. works great with the wide angle lens and the f/22. Great detail with your lens. The color really burn here, especially the blue.
best wishes, Thilo
|
|
|
Riny Koopman
{K:102911} 3/31/2006
|
Congrats for featured chritiqe! Groetjes, Riny
|
|
|
Orazio Minnella
{K:49417} 3/31/2006
|
Beautiful shot!!!!
|
|
|
Roberto Arcari Farinetti
{K:209486} 3/31/2006
|
my friend.. i'm so happy another great front page for your great show! i agree with you for the moment of your choice for the landscape,..the point of view is very good increase in a big mode the perpsective and effect!
well done..
cheers
roby
|
|
|
Danny Brannigan
{K:19523} 3/31/2006
|
Good strong colours Hugo and nice to know your fit enough to get down to the level of the flowers.
|
|
|
Markus Scholz
{K:23722} 3/31/2006
|
The same low perspective, but quite a difference to the no. I. This one lives from the contrast colors of the flowers and the sky, and the mountains just complement it. Excellent image!
Regards, Markus
|
|
|
Khaled Mursi Hammoud
{K:54005} 3/31/2006
|
Very nice use of the 12mm lens... actually I have a similar 12-24mm lens but a sigma one. I like the yellow, blue and brown tones and the flowers in the foreground added a lot to the perspective. Excellent work as usual Hugo, Khaled.
|
|
|
Jeanette Hägglund
{K:59855} 3/31/2006
|
What i like most here is the low angle, so that the sweet small thiny flowers get protagonist in front of the mountins. The bold yellow and blue are eye-catching and are exactly the colours i wanna se now - sunny, blue sky and spring flowers blooming. It´s nice to see how these flowers create a yellow field, also add colour to the ground, cause the soil and mountins seems so grey when comparing. I don´t mind for the "negative space" at the right, cause it´s well balanced with the rocks 1/3 from the top and the flowers at the 1/3 from the bottom left... We can´t fill the image everywhere cause then we loose too much, thats my opinion.
Congrats for featured chritiqe!
Jeanette
|
|
|
John Bohner
{K:8368} 3/31/2006
|
You dont mention it, so I assume you did not meet it...but...in DV there is a tiny cactus about 1-2 inches in diameter. You can put a hand down on it without noticing it first. Quite the nasty! Strange how the barren desert magnifies the attention these sparse flowers actually get! My congratulations on actually getting lower than the flowers ;-) I still get a rush from that blue sky. John B
|
|
|
Shirley Grove
{K:5514} 3/31/2006
|
Stunning shot - I love it!!! Shirley
|
|
|
So Cal Photograhper
{K:18529} 3/31/2006
|
Great perspective and a wonderful DOF.
Lisa
|
|
|
João F * Photography
{K:41945} 3/31/2006
|
Hugo well done my friend nice perspective and view1 jo
|
|
|
Joel Aron
{K:14920} 3/31/2006
|
..errrt. I meant 'framed on the left' Doh! damn cinema camera talk gets me every time here on UF!
sorry to re-post :)
-joel
|
|
|
Joel Aron
{K:14920} 3/31/2006
|
Wow Hugo!
Incredible depth and detail! (I love wide lense shots!)
I dig that you framed the main flower to the right, and opened up the rest of the image to vanish into the depth of the perspective. So cool! The way that flower stands agains the sky works so well.
The detail in the soil, and rocks is so sharp! I bet this look amazing 1:1! Your exposure is perfect! the sky, the flower (weed?) and the mountains all in line... so nice!
Well done..and very well spotted!
cheers, -Joel
|
|
|
Lori Stitt
{K:75282} 3/31/2006
|
Ahhhh.....my kind of image, Hugo! Love this one, clear blue sky, low angle, and pretty desert flowers.
A fine image indeed, nice composition, Lori :)
|
|
|
Ron Wilson
{K:18362} 3/31/2006
|
I like the way the principle flower on the left grabs your attention when you 1st look at the photo. After which you are attracted to the mountain in the bg to the right and lastly to the beuatiful blue sky. All in a very pleasant shot.
|
|
|
Don Loseke
{K:32503} 3/30/2006
|
Now that is getting right down among the flowers. That's hard for us old folks to do. Get down is easy the hard part is getting up.. We don't see many of these views unless we fall down. The yellow contrasts nicely with the great blue sky. Don.
|
|
|
Hugo de Wolf
{K:185110} 3/30/2006
|
Hi Joggie, now it's my turn to return the gratitude for the elaborate feedback, much appreciated!
I most certainly was fortunate with this field of flowers.
Reading your comment, I thought I gave some false information in my about, but cross checking, I didn't... I shot this photo around noon. We were on our way to the Borax works from the previous shot, via a detour to wait for the sunset. Even though this was a treat, there are so many extremely beautiful places in Death Valley, screaming out for sunrise or sunset shoots, that we just couldn't afford waiting here for the sun to set.... But yes, I quite agree, it would definitely been awesome with soft and low light....:)
Cheers,
Hugo
|
|
|
Hugo de Wolf
{K:185110} 3/30/2006
|
Ha Riny, dank voor je commentaar. Deze foto is in Death Valley gemaakt, een van de meest extreme plekken op aarde. Het laagste punt op het westelijk halfrond, 83m. onder NAP. In de zomer kan de temperatuur boven de 55 graden uitkomen, toen ik er was vroor het 's ochtends... Regen? Heheheheh:) Nog geen 5 cm per jaar...:)
Geweldige plek!
Jij ook een heel goed weekeinde,
Hugo
|
|
|
Riny Koopman
{K:102911} 3/30/2006
|
The simplicity of this scene works well. The little tiny yellow flowers is very nice and the blue sky goes well with the landscape.Als ik heel goed naar je foto kijkt heeft het in tijden niet meer geregend...?? Alvast voor morgen een heel fijn weekend, Groetjes, Riny
|
|
|
Joggie van Staden
{K:41700} 3/30/2006
|
The vastnessof desrt landscapes make it often very difficult to find a point of interest to anchor the shot in the foreground. You were fortunate here. A week or two earlier/later would have left you with a very monotonous foreground. I like the low angle and the bright yellow that ofsett beautifully with the dul grey and brown of the foreground. It also softens up some of the harshness of the area - inviting you to explore more. The one thing I wonder about is the time of day. This must have been taken closer to midday rather than morning/evening. A shot erly in the morning/late afternoon might have add a lot of mood and impact (e.g. yellow flowers turning gold against the lower light). But thats just nit picking - I know we dont always have time to stay or come back for that light conditions. Kind regards. Joggie
|
|
|
Hugo de Wolf
{K:185110} 3/30/2006
|
Hi Ursula, thanks for your comment.
Sure you are qualified! You know what you like and what you don't like right? Well, I believe those are the key issues to critique any photo! With something as subjective as photography, it's never about right or wrong.... To make it easy, start with the ones in the CC area you like, and describe what you like about it, and what you would've done differently. It's as simple as that, and people will appreciate it! I know I would...:)
Cheers,
Hugo
|
|
|
Ursula Luschnig
{K:21723} 3/30/2006
|
Hi Hugo,this is the kind of shot I really love.. the angle,the perspective and especially the big flower in the foreground.As I feel not qualified for constructive critique,so I better comment on this one... :) Cheers,Ursula
|
|
|
Hugo de Wolf
{K:185110} 3/30/2006
|
LOL! Me, my drive is usually increased when I'm on vacation or otherwise traveling... Want to absorb it all, see it all (and take my time to see it properly) and I'm happy if there's clean, warm water and electricity around...:) Unfortunately that doesn't happen too often when the wife and kid tag along...:)
Cheers,
Hugo
|
|
|
Elsa Mota Gomes
{K:1565} 3/30/2006
|
a very interesting work, good colors and composition make this one a real pleasure to the eyes
|
|
|
Salvatore Rossignolo
{K:13559} 3/30/2006
|
Man, you must be single Hugo. I like places like this to shoot and visit, but if there is no spa, casino, beach, or at least a Zagat rated restaurant it'll be hard to get out to it. Great shot the DOF is amazing, and you've accomplished razor-sharp focus at f22....strong! Sal
|
|
|
Susan Hernandez
{K:6487} 3/30/2006
|
What a awesome perspective, wonderful colors and excellent composition, well done
|
|
|
Nigel Watts.
{K:5237} 3/30/2006
|
Wonderful angle and colours Great photograph Nigel
|
|
|
Piero Somma
{K:13399} 3/30/2006
|
first..it's fantastic!... i like the 3 sction effect (like 3d!)...geometries well broken from flawers in the sky..nothing about contrast & colors simply perfect....great shot (in my favorite!) ready for award....(i hope) ciao
|
|
|
luisa vassallo
{K:28230} 3/30/2006
|
I like this photo. The contrast between life and dead, the color and shadow are very beautiful!!
|
|
|
eleonora frago
{K:2472} 3/30/2006
|
a desert view very well represented. the low point of view gives much force to the atmosphere, in my opinion. great capture :) eleonora
|
|
|
Gorilla K
{K:17526} 3/30/2006
|
the image has nice color and contrast...great angle, prespective and DOF!!!...wonderful landscape...very beautiful!
best regards, Winfried
|
|
|
Kevin Prestage
{K:117} 3/30/2006
|
Great angle. I love the colors. I've never been to death valley but hope to go soon.
Kevin
|
|
|
Hugo de Wolf
{K:185110} 3/30/2006
|
Hi Tony,
Not sure what you mean by the negative space in the foreground, although I think I see what you mean. (I'd be grateful if you'd explain it, though...:)
I'm not aware of the existence of a specific PL filter for wide angle lenses. I've used my regular one, which works well, if used with caution in order to prevent localising the effect too much.
Cheers,
Hugo
|
|
|
brian underdown
{K:-960} 3/30/2006
|
good angle ,something so small becomes so big in a 12mm focal .like the perspective of this angle.
brian
|
|
|
Tony Smallman
{K:23858} 3/30/2006
|
Well saturated with a nice balance between the protagonists and the mountains.Maybe a touch too much of negative space in the foreground. .....Tony PS.Is there a polariser for such wide angle lenses?
|
|