Carl Zeiss
(K=6) - Comment Date 12/15/2004
|
|
|
|
|
Carl Zeiss
(K=6) - Comment Date 12/15/2004
|
|
|
|
|
Carl Zeiss
(K=6) - Comment Date 12/15/2004
|
|
|
|
|
Carl Zeiss
(K=6) - Comment Date 12/15/2004
|
|
|
|
|
Roger Williams
(K=86139) - Comment Date 12/15/2004
|
|
|
|
|
Ray Heath
(K=4559) - Comment Date 12/15/2004
|
|
|
|
|
Carl Zeiss
(K=6) - Comment Date 12/15/2004
|
I only want to know your view on these photos
|
|
|
|
Anthony Gargani
(K=4527) - Comment Date 12/15/2004
|
hmmm...
Now that's the most creative way I've seen of getting around the upload limit!
What do I think of your pictures?
I think you should go back to the main page and load them into your portfolio one photo per 24hrs (or three if you are a donor).
I'll give you my opinion then...
btw-#1 is pretty cool
|
|
|
|
Rajnish Duara
(K=1142) - Comment Date 12/15/2004
|
Scores: Pix 1: 4/7
Pix 3 and 4: 6/7
Pix 5: 3.5/7
All the best.
|
|
|
|
Carl Zeiss
(K=6) - Comment Date 12/15/2004
|
Thank you for you comments
There are some others in addition.
|
|
|
|
Anthony Gargani
(K=4527) - Comment Date 12/17/2004
|
Well, this is getting more interesting by the minute (day?)...
First you post a ton of pics in the forum and ask for input and critique...
Yesterday your name was Olie *something* if I remember correctly wasn't it?
Today you have become Carl Zeiss and posted two pics in a normal user portfolio.
(I thought at one point Usefilm required its members to use their *real* names, or the name of their studio. I guess its no longer a requirement. My apologies if you really are "Carl Zeiss".)
Perhaps you are a very famous mystery guest?
I for one will stay tuned in for the next installment of the Usefilm Not-Quite-Reality Show!
|
|
|
|
James McGinnis
(K=6045) - Comment Date 12/17/2004
|
Yes. If it's not really your name, are these really your pictures?
|
|
|
|
TheTroubledMan WhoWasDefamed
(K=-215) - Comment Date 1/30/2005
|
You think you don't have to follow any rules outside your Beijing, you're wrong! You are poisoning this community, and I am ashamed for you as a fellow Chinese. By the way, your photos looked really ugly.
|
|
|
|
Chris Lauritzen
(K=14949) - Comment Date 1/31/2005
|
This post should be deleted immediately!
|
|
|
|
Pico diGoliardi
(K=540) - Comment Date 2/6/2005
|
No disrespect intended, but this is just wrong for two reasons; first the pictures seem to be working about the gallery and second, there is nothing remarkable about them in this context.
If one wants to view hundreds, possibly thousands of pictures of Bejing, surf the net.
|
|
|
|
Kambiz K
(K=37420) - Comment Date 2/21/2006
|
overall they are very interesting to view. that's all.
|
|
|
|
