|
|
cerebral marv
{K:217} 11/6/2005
|
excellent title with great thoughts!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Luke Luther
{K:14693} 11/5/2005
|
Thilo, the exposure was actually 6.5 seconds. I wanted to be sure there was enough time for a smaller aperture. I also wanted to have no flash reflections in the metal particles.
|
|
|
|
Thilo Bayer
{K:50358} 11/5/2005
|
Hi Luke,
I like your idea with the rocks series and the importance of rocks in general. The textures and the toning are fine done. As Stefan said, I tend to judge that the white stone lost some detail. Not easy to judge on this part =)
5 seconds?
best wishes,
Thilo
|
|
|
|
|
Luke Luther
{K:14693} 11/5/2005
|
Stefan, that particular stone is actually that white.
|
|
|
|
|
Neal Nye
{K:15827} 11/5/2005
|
It's going to be a very interesting project. Somehow you've imbued them with significance in this mysterious presentation, making us wonder where they've been and what they're made of. They're so nicely arranged.They'd be good in color too.
|
|
|
|
Diego Latt
{K:6884} 11/4/2005
|
Excellent title Luke.
This is a very sense and impressive shot.
Well done my friend, and I'll hope you luck in your project with rocks. I love this.
Diego (7)
|
|
|
|
|
Stefan Engström
{K:24473} 11/4/2005
|
I love rocks as well... I like the presentation with complete black in-between the stones, but I think you might have lost a little bit of detail in the light larger stone...
|
|
0 
